Search for: "In re Diamond Decisions Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2010, 4:19 am by David Cheifetz
A shorthand way of describing reasons that fulfill these functional requirements is to say that the reasons permit meaningful appellate review”: Diamond Auto Collision Inc. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
Cir. 1995); In re Bell, 991 F.2d 781 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:05 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Appellants rely principally on the Seventh Circuit's decision in In re Bridgestone/Firestone Inc., 288 F.3d 1012 (7th Cir.2002) ("Bridgestone"), a case involving the certification of a nationwide class alleging tort claims arising under the laws of all fifty states. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
And so the best way to truly learn the law is to read the major Supreme Court decisions about the law, to read only the majority opinions, and to read all of them. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The agency’s decision was announced in a legal settlement with the Center for Biological Diversity. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:37 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In Diamond, defendants Oreamuno and Gonzalez were respectively the Chairman of the Board and President of Management Assistance, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Align Tech., Inc., 463 F.3d 1299, 1312 (Fed. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Pattern jury instructions are merely diamonds in the rough. [read post]