Search for: "J. A. Nicklin" Results 101 - 120 of 321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2022, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
A fair and accessible justice system, and an active and inquiring media, lie at the heart of our democracy. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
On 9 June 2022, the trial of preliminary issues in the case of The Duke of Sussex v Associated Newspapers was held before Nicklin J. [read post]
30 May 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  Indeed, TalkTalk sits within a longer line of authorities which are consistent on the point, including Morrisons, as well as, more recently Stadler v Currys Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 160 (QB) and Underwood & Underwood v Bounty UK Ltd & or [2022] EWHC 888 (QB) – the latter in particular being of note, given that the judgment was given by Nicklin J, the Judge in Charge of the Media and Communications List. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 26 May 2022, Nicklin J heard an application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As mentioned above, on 18 May 2022 Nicklin J refused trial by jury in the case of Blake and others v Fox. [read post]
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
On 5 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hamblin v News Group Newspapers Limited before Nicklin J On 6 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley Lennon before Nicklin J. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 13 April 2022, Nicklin J handed down judgment in the MPI and breach of data rights case of (1) Underwood, (2) Underwood v (1) Bounty UK Ltd, (2) Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2022] EWHC 888 (QB). [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
On 6 and 7 April 2022 there was a hearing in MBR Acres Limited and others v FREE THE MBR BEAGLES before Nicklin J. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
The Sun has settled a defamation claim brought by an immigration solicitor it accused of “shamelessly touting” a price list of legal aid fees for migrants arriving in small boats. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The Data Protection Report blog has a discussion of Nicklin J’s recent decision in SMO v Tik Tok. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
There has long been a tension between the principles of open justice and the desire of parties litigating sensitive matters to keep their identity, parts of the litigation, or even the fact of the litigation itself, private. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Recent Judgments On 10 February 2022 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the case of Harcombe v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2022] EWHC 543 (QB)  dealing with the question as to whether there should be preliminary issues in what the judge described as “the most significant piece of defamation litigation that I have seen in a very long time” [9]. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled a class-action lawsuit against TikTok concerning children’s privacy violations can proceed, SMO v TikTok Inc. and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2022 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of SMO v Tik Tok Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 21 February 2022, Nicklin J heard an application to commit for contempt in the privacy case of Hayden v Duckworth. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:44 am by CMS
” As did Nicklin J, Simon LJ accepted that the expectation was not invariable. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 12:24 am by INFORRM
On 16 February 2022, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]