Search for: "J. C. SMITH"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2023, 8:10 am
DYLAN J. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
Mack, 49 F. 4th 941, 949 (CA5 2022) (Smith, J.) [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
The issue is whether section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act protects internet platforms when their algorithms make targeted recommendations using content from other providers. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am
On appeal, Meade J disagreed and upheld the registration. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
Dietderich and J. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
The two cases cited by the epidemiology chapter, Kehm and Ellis, both involved “factual findings” in public investigative or evaluative reports, which were independently admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(C).[10] As such, the cases failed to support the chapter’s suggestion that Rule 703 is a rule of admissibility for epidemiologic studies. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 10:32 am
Rudelich & Megan C. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 10:15 pm
Per Carr J in Parsa v DS Smith Plc [2019] Costs LR 331 at [35] in respect of an application in respect of fixed following late acceptance of a Part 36 offer: “The substantive litigation had ended; the claim had settled in relation to all bar costs and had been stayed by the automatic operation of CPR 36.14 . [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 2:39 pm
Tran & J. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Knight First Amendment Institute (2021) (Thomas, J., concurring) Lee C. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Smith, [1992] 2 S.C.R. 915, at pp. 937-38), or “a sufficient substitute basis for testing the evidence” (Khelawon, at para. 105). [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
At first instance Nicklin J found for the claimant, a finding which was upheld by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
., Remschmidt, C., Wilking, H., … & Kühne, M. (2011). [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 5:50 am
., Remschmidt, C., Wilking, H., … & Kühne, M. (2011). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
District Judge Carl J. [read post]
18 Dec 2022, 3:52 pm
[J&J], a manufacturer and seller of cosmetic talc. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
The Claimant alleges that the Proposed Disclosure would be (a) a breach of contract; (b) a breach of confidence and/or misuse of private information; and (c) a breach of the Claimant’s data protection rights under GDPR and Data Protection Act 2018. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:28 pm
References Smith KE, Medus C, Meyer SD, et al. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In fact, were we to time travel, we would find that the surname Hernández took up as much space as the most common Anglo names such as Smith in the big fat NYC phonebooks. [read post]
