Search for: "JOHN DOE(S) A-Z" Results 101 - 120 of 243
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
, Tanya Aplin and Jason John Bosland, King’s College London and University of Melbourne Next week in the courts The trial in Yeo v Times Newspapers will continue on 19 and 20 October 2015. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 11:35 am by JD Hull
Does this description of the global legal landscape in 2006 still stand up? [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Matter of Z-Z-O-, 26 I&N Dec. 586 (BIA 2015); The Board held that an Immigration Judge’s determination of future events in the context of an asylum case, is a finding of fact and subject to a clearly erroneous standard of review. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:49 am
 As George's mystical chords echoed through the speakers and Paul and John's vocals jostled for attention, the AmeriKat was transported to conversations with her boy-band obsessed peers who would only stare blankly at the AmeriKat when she raised her equally fanatic love of The Beatles. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:19 pm
It is the actual date of the Last Supper that differs.Well, you ask, why does it matter? [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Shawn Garrison
(How many “Jay Zs got 99 problems and a [woman] is one” jokes have you heard?) [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 12:03 pm by Jack Goldsmith
The Draft AUMF Does Not Limit The President. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
The CJEU in Svensson (C-466/12) ruled that a clickable hyperlink (as well as a framing link) to an authorised and publicly available work does not infringe the communication to the public right, because the public is not new. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:23 am
Although Chauncey’s contribution would obviously be less than that of Jay Z, UK law does not require that the individual contributions of the joint authors be equal in terms of quality, quantity or originality.Whatever the 1988 Act states, its provisions, and hence any claim to authorship based on them, can be overridden by any contractual agreement to the contrary. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
  The U.S. alleged and a jury this week agreed,  that Zwerner’s FBAR violations were “willful. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
” In Z v Finland [1997]the same Court found Finland in breach of Article 8 of the Convention by disclosing the name of Zs name and medical information (in a relation to a case whereby one of the issues related to when Zs husband’s contracted HIV). [read post]