Search for: "James S Mueller" Results 101 - 120 of 677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The plea agreement was so generous to Flynn, in fact, that at the time, it appeared to be an indication that Mueller anticipated Flynn’s cooperation would be extremely valuable. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Many commentators, ourselves among them, have criticized Durham’s probe as an apparent effort by Barr to cast the legitimacy of the Mueller investigation into doubt, and Jensen’s review is open to similar criticism as part of the same effort. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
When Trump fired FBI Director James Comey, after all, there was outrage. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
He thinks that he “won” the impeachment confrontation because he is still in office, even though he is only the third President in history to be impeached and even though some of his own party’s senators said that he was guilty and wrong but should be punished—if at all—at the polls.Similarly, Trump insists that his fateful phone call with Ukraine’s president was perfect, and he repeats endlessly that the Mueller report was a full… [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:14 am by Jacqueline R. McAllister
” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1 (February 2000), pp. 90–117, doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2000.0006; James F. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Even Trump’s repeated claims that the Mueller report exonerated him have been, at best, based on that report’s conclusion that Muellers investigators could not say with confidence that they could successfully prosecute a criminal conspiracy charge against Trump. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Stone was the sixth Trump associate convicted and the last person indicted in special counsel Robert Muellers investigation. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
There was never any mystery about Donald Trump’s ignorance of the Constitution or his disdain for the rule of law. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:53 am by Josh Blackman
I developed this history for an article I'm working on, tentatively titled "What if Mueller had subpoenaed Trump? [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:49 am by James Prankerd Smith
James Prankerd SmithTwo decisions T 0184/17 and T 0603/14 were recently issued concerning admissibility of late inventive step attacks on appeal. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Whether the allegations against President Trump—e.g., that he asked then-director James Comey of the FBI to end the Michael Flynn/Russia investigation and then fired Comey for not complying—are legally and morally troubling depends largely on what the President’s motives were. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
What does that mean for people’s day-to-day lives? [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:38 pm by CAFE
A former federal prosecutor, Wainstein spent 19 years in the Justice Department and also served as General Counsel, and then Chief of Staff to then-Director Robert Mueller. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” Following Muellers remarks, Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) stated that “Congress has a legal and moral obligation to begin impeachment proceedings immediately. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm by David Kris
So, what does the inspector general’s report say about political bias? [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:02 pm by Jim Sedor
Before Robert Muellers probe, few were even aware of this insider economy of lawyers, lobbyists, and consultants representing foreign officials, corporations, and political parties. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 10:08 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
James Rogan and approved on a party-line vote, added language to the article concerning Bill Clinton’s false statements to the grand jury. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:19 am by Keith E. Whittington
So long as the Mueller investigation held the possibility that the president might be linked to actual criminal activity, the question of whether impeachable offenses had to be indictable crimes was not a particularly salient one for either the administration’s critics or its defenders. [read post]