Search for: "John Doe(s) 1 through 100 inclusive" Results 101 - 110 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm by Kenneth Vercammen
" “It is absolutely clear from this record that [Super Lawyers does] not permit a lawyer to buy one’s way onto the list, nor is there any requirement for the purchase of any product for inclusion in the lists or any quid pro quo of any kind or nature associated with the evaluation and listing of an attorney or in the subsequent advertising of one’s inclusion in the lists. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm by Glenn
The record will guide the path forward through the rulemaking process at the FCC, in Congress and across the Executive Branch, as all consider how best to implement the plan’s recommendations. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
Hanley, The Associated Press, December 6, 2009 By executive action, the Obama administration can boost the U.S. target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions beyond levels envisioned in legislation working its way through Congress, the head of the U.N. climate science network said Sunday. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
We focus also on the relevant Georgia-Pacific factors, as presented to the jury through all the evidence and particularly the experts' testimony. 1. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
Assuming that the population of interest constitutes those individuals who committed sex offences in Canada during the period between 1966 and 1974, (1) we have identified at least three ways in which the sample under study appears not to be representative of this wider population.First, it is unclear from where the 351 subjects of this study were drawn. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
Members are also active with the Children's Hospital, Part C, the Academy of Pediatrics, and work with many other health advocates. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
Does your ministry of education trumpet the importance of an "inclusive curriculum"? [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
He further wrote that as argued by the General Counsel, "the Board has found that a striker's use of the most vile and vulgar language, including racial epithets, does not deprive him of the protection of the Act, so long as those actions do not constitute a threat. [read post]