Search for: "Justice Prince"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,673
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2023, 9:50 am
The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:49 am
The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The Lerner Decision In May 2014, the First Department issued Lerner v Prince (119 AD3d 122 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
On 1 June 2023, Justice Anthony Besanko found four of the six murder allegations were substantially true. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
In a 7-2 majority opinion authored by Justice Sotomayor, the court found that both Warhol’s artwork and Goldsmith’s original photograph served the same purpose of depicting Prince in magazine stories about him. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
However, Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2 prohibits Congress from suspending the Writ except in certain cases.[12] In Ex parte Merriman, Chief Justice Taney held that only Congress could suspend the privilege of the writ because clause 2 is in Art.1, a strict reading that denied the president any authority regarding the writ or its suspension even under his war powers.[13] In his message to Congress on July 4, 1861, Lincoln gave Taney his celebrated reply,… [read post]
30 May 2023, 8:40 pm
Clients commend the firm’s commitment to achieving justice and providing compassionate support during challenging times. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:09 pm
Years later, in 2016, after Prince passed away, Conde Nast publishing put out a special magazine commemorating the life of Prince, and they licensed the orange version from the Prince series from the Warhol Foundation to use on the cover of that commemorative magazine. [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:55 am
HRH Prince of Wales v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:56 am
The opinion written by Justice Sotomayor, in which Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett and Jackson joined, held that the “purpose and character” of AWF’s commercial use of Warhol’s portraits of Prince shared the same commercial purpose of the original photograph taken by Ms. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, writing for the majority, noted that both the original photograph and Warhol’s “Orange Prince” were portraits of Prince used in magazines to illustrate stories about him. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The Press Gazette and Guardian describe the naming of Marandi as a victory for open justice. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:09 pm
Last week, in a 7–2 decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court ruled that a 1984 work by artist Andy Warhol, portraying world-renowned singer Prince against an orange background (the “Orange Prince series”), infringed on the copyrights held by rock photographer Lynn Goldsmith. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
With the Supreme Court approaching the start of summer, the justices will likely decide the Court’s major remaining cases by late June. [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:38 am
The majority opinion was penned by Justice Sotomayor, who matched Justice Kagan’s eloquent yet heated dissent footnote for footnote over the course of an 87-page exchange. [read post]
21 May 2023, 6:51 am
IS JUSTICE AVAILABLE? [read post]
20 May 2023, 3:27 am
To the consternation of dissenting justice Elena Kagan, the 7-2 majority went with the opinion written by Sonia Sotomayor that it was not fair use. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:01 pm
Only Justice Elena Kagan, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, dissented. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:30 am
“As portraits of Prince used to depict Prince in magazine stories about Prince, the original photograph and AWF’s copying use of it share substantially the same purpose,” wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor for the majority. [read post]
