Search for: "LANGLEY v. LANGLEY"
Results 101 - 120
of 142
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2010, 2:36 pm
Phelan, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing D&L Langley Trucking: Scott E. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:13 am
But U.S. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:21 am
Such was the case in Langley v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:51 pm
In this week’s case (Elgood v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 5:12 pm
In today’s case (Mavi v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:58 pm
More on the 2002 Supreme Court ruling in Atkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
Significantly, there is no right of appeal to the Crown Court against a decision of the magistrates' to vary (or not to vary) an ASBO; one must either seek judicial review or appeal by way of case stated - Langley v Preston Crown Court [2008] EWHC 2623 (Admin). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:46 am
I use it to promote Dale Langley & Co. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
If you need advice on any of the above issues, or on anything to do with employment law, please contact me at Dale Langley & Co – 0207 464 8433 – or michaelscutt@dalelangley.co.uk [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:24 pm
Justice Antonin Scalia put it best speaking about Section 13(e) in Langley v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
The collision occurred while the Plaintiff was rear-ended on a highway in Langley, BC. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 2:30 am
A case involving Dale Langley (my partner's) previous firm, Langley & Co, called Taylor v Connex South Eastern EAT/1243/99 [2000] held that a lapse of two years was insufficient. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 1:14 am
Abbey National v Miller [2006] EWCA Civ 1520; [2007] EWCA Civ 138 Miller-Foulds v Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs [2008] EWHC 3443 (Ch); [2009] EWCA Civ 1132 You'd be forgiven for not having noticed any of this (long running) litigation over the last 3 years (if only because you need both Casetrack and Lawtel in order to find all four judgments, none of which seem to be on Bailii). [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 6:31 am
Besides echoing the Langley v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 1:47 am
There was a conceptual difference between determining whether or not a breach had occured and whether or not the landlord would be able to go on to forfeit the lease (although not cited, see Swanson Grange v Langley-Essen LRX/12/2007 in support of this proposition). [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
Langley (Township), 2007 BCSC 993 [Aberdeen]; reversed in part, Aberdeen v. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 162 BC: Eleazar Maccabeus was crushed to death at the Battle of Beth-zechariah by a War elephant that he believed to be carrying Seleucid King Antiochus V; charging in to battle, Eleazar rushed underneath the elephant and thrust a spear into its belly, whereupon it fell dead on top of him * 4 BC: Herod the Great suffered from fever, intense rashes, colon pains, foot drop, inflammation of the abdomen, a putrefaction of his genitals that produced worms, convulsions, and difficulty… [read post]
