Search for: "Lawyer Campbell v. United State" Results 101 - 120 of 231
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  Both Peck v United Kingdom (2003) 36 EHRR 41(in which in the moments preceding the claimant’s suicide attempt were caught on CCTV and broadcast on television) and Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 (where the defendant published photos of the claimant outside a Narcotics Anonymous meeting) have been cited with approval in New Zealand courts. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The Queensland premier, Campbell Newman, has accused his lawyers of contempt of court and interfering with the administration of justice. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Background to the Story On October 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia determined that NAGPRA does not apply to the requested repatriation of Jim Thorpe’s remains. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:24 am by Ben
 Automated Solutions Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:08 am by admin
Coca-Cola Co.); increasing ongoing debate about whether photo-shopped advertising should be banned or regulated in the United States; and then this morning what I thought was a very interesting comment on a potential lawsuit by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (“CSPI”) against Campbell Soup Company for alleged false marketing claims for its V8 Splash and V8 V-Fusion Refresher drinks (see: here). [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is perhaps ironic that Wigmore has had far more staying power in Canada than in his home country, the United States. [read post]
15 May 2014, 3:17 pm by Tim Clancy
Execution of people with documented mental retardation is unlawful in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
  However, the explanatory notes to the Act indicate that the new defence is intended to reflect the common law as set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [2012] UKSC 11, in which Lord Mance stated that it would seldom be in the public interest “…to publish material which has not been the subject of responsible journalistic enquiry and consideration. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
In the United States, Courtney Love is being sued by her former lawyer for a defamatory tweet in which Ms Love said “I was f***ing devastated when Rhonda J Holmes Esq of san diego was bought off @fairnewsspears perhaps you can get a quote,’” There was a report about in the trial in the Daily Mail. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:49 am by Steven Gursten
Yesterday I wrote about the case that focused the national spotlight on State Farm – Campbell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
Intervenor Defendant United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“USPTO”) Motion for Summary Judgment on its Fair Use Defense and Counterclaim (Doc. [read post]