Search for: "Lockheed Martin Corp. "
Results 101 - 120
of 293
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2013, 6:46 am
Dukes decision has been cited more than 1,200 times by state and federal courts handling similar types of complaints, some against retailers, such as Family Dollar Stores, others against government contractors, such as Lockheed Martin Corp. and even in the publishing industry, with one large case involving Hearst Corp. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
” See Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
The relatively small $15 million contracts—awarded to Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, and General Atomics (the manufacturer of the Predator and Reaper armed drones)—will fund preliminary design reviews of proposals from the companies. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1150 [UCL provides equitable avenue for prevention of unfair business practices, with streamlined procedures and limited remedies].) [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:53 pm
(Lockheed Martin, Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:36 pm
Lockheed Martin Corporation appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:55 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 431 F.3d 966, 972 (6th Cir. 2005), that Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading standard applies to first-filed complaints under the first to file rule. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:05 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp., 431 F.3d 966, 972 (6th Cir. 2005) that in deciding whether a second or subsequently filed qui tam complaint was barred, the initial relator's complaint concerning the same matter must satisfy the heightened pleading standard of Rule 9(b). [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 9:00 am
Most recently, on Tuesday, the Tenth Circuit held that an employee is protected under Sarbanes-Oxley for reporting misconduct even when the misconduct does not involve a fraud against shareholders (Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Everest Minerals Corp., 362 F. [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:50 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 29 Cal.4th 1134, 1152 (2003) (“nonrestituionary disgorgement of profits is not an available remedy . . . under the UCL”). [read post]
13 May 2013, 4:00 am
Lockheed Martin Defense 8. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:41 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp. on August 2, 2012, reversing the lower court and holding that cost estimates submitted by government contractor Lockheed Martin Corp. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:23 am
., Boeing and Lockheed Martin Corp. employees and their families. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 8:46 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp., 431 F.3d 966, 971 (6th Cir. 2005) which held that “[o]nly a complaint that complies with Rule 9(b) can have preemptive effect under [31 U.S.C]. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., 63 P.3d 937, 943 (Cal. 2003). [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Lockheed Martin Corp., supra, 29 Cal.4th at p. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:00 am
As to the element of control, “the only relevant inquiry is the “extent of control … over the third party’s means of infringement,” the court reiterated, citing Tiffany v. eBay and Lockheed Martin. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 2:00 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp., No. 11-55278 (9th. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:30 pm
Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Denver, built the spacecraft. [read post]
