Search for: "Lowe v. United States of America et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Plasteak, Inc. et al. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
GraceTERRY MABRY et al. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
Rather, it is the combination of a 1913 decision of the United States Supreme Court, Michigan Central R.R. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
National Football League et al. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(IP finance) Withdrawing patent applications – a matter of priority (IPKat) United States US General U.S. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Most of the communities served by the drinking water treatment plants that will be upgraded under the agreement are in low income communities. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
CPSC 2008 Performance and Accountability Report, November 2008) Meanwhile, traffic fatalities in the United States have fallen to record lows. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Given the choice, many viewers will opt for what many public interest regulatory supporters would consider to be “low-brow” offerings over the programming that policymakers feel the masses should be consuming. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:25 am
Becton, Dickinson and Co (case no. 2009-1008) (Patently-O) District Court N D Ohio: Amended pleading adding a new party relates back to the original filing date for purposes of first-to-file venue rule: Horton Archery LLC v American Hunting Innovations LLC et al (Docket Report) District Court M D Florida: ITC finding of noninfringement warrants summary judgement of noninfringement in parallel lawsuit: Solomon Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
Thomas Dale Delay et al. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
" Any holdups in the case were the results of FireStar's inability to pay and reluctance to make key decisions, like authorizing the hiring of experts, the firm stated in court documents. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:39 pm
CONNORS, a Minor, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
McSorley's Old Ale HouseMarilyn A. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 8:16 am
Supreme Court which decided the historic case about global warming (Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 8:27 pm
Eurodif and United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
