Search for: "Lujan v. Does" Results 101 - 120 of 170
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 8:03 am by Michael Froomkin
The issue for me goes back to a key standing decision, Lujan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:48 am by Steve Vladeck
As I explain below the fold, the key is in understanding the critical difference between Justice Scalia’s opinion for the majority in Lujan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 11:36 am
  Plus 11 years.P.S. - Justice Hoffstadt does need to change one portion of the opinion, which clearly lost something in the editing process. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:08 pm by Michelle Yeary
Irby, 326 F.3d 644, 648-49 (5th Cir. 2003) (holding fraudulent joinder and Rule 12(b)(6) standards are similar but the scope of the inquire is different because for fraudulent joinder, the court can “pierce the pleadings”);  Lujan v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:21 pm by Steve Davies
Lujan, 504 U.S. at 56 NAHB does not explain, however, how the TNW Determination adversely affects either the “manner” of regulation or, with any specificity, the “types of watercourses” subject to regulation. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Ostrer had standing in this case, because only he met the three requirements for standing outlined in Lujan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Ostrer had standing in this case, because only he met the three requirements for standing outlined in Lujan v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:23 pm
Holder, 602 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2010) was released last week, overturning the long standing case of Lujan-Armendariz v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:23 pm
Holder, 602 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2010) was released last week, overturning the long standing case of Lujan-Armendariz v. [read post]