Search for: "Lyrissa Lidsky" Results 101 - 120 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 2:00 am by mes286
Professor Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Raymond & Miriam Ehrlich Chair in U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 11:14 am by Erin Miller
Lyrissa Lidsky at PrawfsBlawg critiques the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Doe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
”  And at PrawfsBlawg, Lyrissa Lidsky reads “the oral argument tea leaves” in FCC v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:08 pm by Usha Rodrigues
  Lyrissa Lidsky suggests as much in a comment to Michael's post--and says "When I teach seminars, I state very clearly in my syllabus that lack of originality is grounds for a failing grade. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Lyrissa Lidsky has written on problems of using sock puppets to push gov’t views—TSA has been accused of doing this on its own websites and on sites like Flyertalk. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:34 am by SHG
Yet again, the words of Lyrissa Lidsky ring in my head. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 4:13 am by SHG
I’m reminded, yet again of the admonition of Lyrissa Lidsky. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:06 am by Usha Rodrigues
  The results: For the interviewees: tips from Lyrissa Lidsky, Bridget Crawford, and Paul Horwitz (twice). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 2:17 pm by Paul Levy
Thanks to section 230 maven Eric Goldman for joining Public Citizen on this amicus brief and to Florida professor Lyrissa Lidsky for being local counsel in the case. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:10 am by Eric Goldman
Nevertheless, working with two law professors in Florida, Faye Jones and Lyrissa Lidsky, and my student research assistant, Jake McGowan, we submitted comments opposing the proposal. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:51 am by Howard Wasserman
By the way, assuming the case comes out the way everyone expects and the matching-funds provision is struck down, McComish will be a paradigmatic example of Lyrissa Lidsky's theory of the Roberts Court's First Amendment: "All speakers, whether individuals or organizations, are treated equallly to the extent they are free from government regulation of their speech; however, speakers who lack resources are not entitled to any government assistance in speaking. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:51 am by Eric Goldman
My schedule tends to get busy around each new year, so my year-end recaps keep coming later and later. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:16 am by Eric Goldman
In response to the second proposal, Lyrissa Lidsky, Rebecca Tushnet, and I submitted a short letter to the Florida Bar explaining why this topic remains stupid. [read post]
1 May 2016, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Lyrissa Lidsky: fighting a myth that these offenders are uniquely likely to reoffend. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Rev. 595, 615 (1990); see also Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Silencing John Doe: Defamation & Discourse in Cyberspace, 49 Duke L.J. 855, 936-37 (2000) (suggesting that words like “scam” are often used loosely and should not be taken literally).] [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 1:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
Michael Froomkin (Miami), Shubha Ghosh (Syracuse), Eric Goldman (Santa Clara), James Grimmelmann (Cornell), Edward Lee (IIT), Lyrissa Lidsky (Florida), Lisa Ramsey (University of San Diego Law School), Jorge Roig (Charleston), David Sorkin (John Marshall), and myself: Based on our experience as law professors who are knowledgeable about the application of the First Amendment to Internet law, we urge you (pursuant to Rule 8.500(g)) to accept the Petition for Review in this case. * *… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Michael Froomkin (Miami), Shubha Ghosh (Syracuse), Eric Goldman (Santa Clara), James Grimmelmann (Cornell), Edward Lee (IIT), Lyrissa Lidsky (Florida), Lisa Ramsey (University of San Diego Law School), Jorge Roig (Charleston), David Sorkin (John Marshall), and myself: Based on our experience as law professors who are knowledgeable about the application of the First Amendment to Internet law, we urge you (pursuant to Rule 8.500(g)) to accept the Petition for Review in this case. * *… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:23 am by emagraken
.), at para. 32, Blair J.A. recognized the Internet’s “tremendous power” to harm reputation, citing with approval the following excerpt from Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky “Silencing John Dow: Defamation & Discourse in Cyberspace” (2000), 49 Duke L.J. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
  The court’s sole black justice was telling us that the Confederate battle flag still means something”; from Ruthann Robson, who at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog observes that the decision “could have wide-ranging effect”; from Ilya Shapiro, who at Cato at Liberty argues that the Court’s decision “has offended the freedom of speech” and that “now we know that the First Amendment is one thing that’s smaller in Texas”; from Leslie… [read post]