Search for: "M T Retort"
Results 101 - 120
of 347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2017, 5:23 am
I’m no fan of Chevron deference. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
AT&T Mobility. [read post]
Political Endorsements Have No Place In Canadian Courts: The case of Justice Zabel and the Trump Hat
14 Nov 2016, 12:26 pm
Having freedom of expression does not permit a judge, acting in that capacity, to wear a Trump hat any more than it does to wear an “I’m With Her” t-shirt, a “Real Change” button, or an NDP scarf. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
The retort is always that “Donald Trump does not hate,” but it doesn’t matter. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 6:14 am
" Someone in the comments says a bra "sops up sweat under your breasts," and I retort "Go braless so you don't develop a place called 'under your breasts.'"5. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 5:06 pm
Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 5:26 am
” A PLAAF Spokesperson retorted that the action was “necessary to safeguard national sovereignty, the country’s security and maintain peaceful development. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:36 am
Kennedy and then serving Vice President Richard M. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:38 pm
Say “no, thanks” or “I’m not interested&rdquo [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 5:51 am
I would never say that I don’t need to prove that I don’t need to prove that I’m opposed to cops being murdered. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am
M. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
The retort to the law is that American flag pins are commonly permitted in the courtroom, so why not BLM? [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Finally, like Rebecca, I’m irked that the court doesn’t understand the difference between a Lanham Act trademark claim and a Lanham Act false advertising claim for purposes of Section 230’s IP exclusion. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 3:47 am
I’m still not sure I got it precisely right. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 4:12 am
Because I’m the arbiter, you see. [read post]
22 May 2016, 5:13 am
That’s the best I’m going to do, so suck it up. [read post]
11 May 2016, 3:53 pm
" This retort is notable because it does not listen to the claim and then provide a substantive, on-the-merits response -- "I actually don't think you were discriminated against for X, Y, and Z reasons". [read post]
5 May 2016, 11:40 am
They seem ridiculous and abnormal, not talking like mature politicians at all (they seem like a bunch of schoolkids whose game could be broken by a simple "I'm rubber, you're glue" retort).Here's the ad again, for reference: [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:55 pm
Justice Anthony M. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:54 am
” When Murphy tried to defend the characterization as routine, Sotomayor scoffed, almost incredulous at the suggestion “[t]hat you as the State say this is an independent contractor and now, by law, we’re going to deem them an officer? [read post]
