Search for: "Mattel, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2013, 2:19 pm
Before anyone else emails the IPKat to let him know, he can tell you that he is fully aware of the two big trade mark rulings from the Court of Appeal for England and Wales last Friday in Société Des Produits Nestlé S.A. v Cadbury UK Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1174 and JW Spear & Son Ltd, Mattel Inc and Mattel UK Ltd v Zynga Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 1175 and he will be providing separate Katposts on them in the fullness of time. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Aug. 8, 2013) (magistrate judge) After expressing sadness that the parties had not decided to chill, Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am by Deborah Schander
App. 418, 333 N.W.2d 67 (1983) Judges say the silliest things: Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:37 am
  It was said in Mattel, Inc. v Walking Mountain Productions, 353 F.3d 792, 802, n. 7 (9th Cir.2003), that the court does “not make judgments about what objects an artist should choose for their art. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
Mattel, Inc., 518 F.3d) to show dilution ("the whittling away of the value of a trademark when it’s used to identify different products", Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:02 pm by Ron Coleman
 But lookie here: A federal appeals court has ruled that Mattel Inc. doesn’t have to pay $172 million to MGA Entertainment Inc. to settle a trade secrets theft claim over Bratz dolls because a key claim should have been dismissed before trial. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:32 pm
Bryant went to work for Mattel Inc., based in El Segundo, California, which claims they began work on designing the dolls with Bryant while he was working for them. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
By Robert Milligan and Joshua Salinas As part of our annual tradition, here is our list of the top 10 developments/headlines in trade secret, computer fraud, and non-compete law for 2012. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:30 am by John L. Welch
Therefore the Board affirmed the refusal.TTABlog comment: For a recent, precedential decision discussing this issue, see Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2012, 1:00 am by Daniel Joshua Salinas
This week, a Ninth Circuit panel consisting of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, Judge Kim Wardlaw, and Judge Stephen Trott, heard oral argument concerning an award of more than $310 million in damages and attorneys’ fees against Mattel, Inc. in its dispute with MGA Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:13 pm
To uphold the registration would allow Mattel to obtain an unfair competitive advantage". [read post]