Search for: "McDonnell Douglas Corp."
Results 101 - 120
of 177
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2014, 7:27 am
Finally, the court pointed out that when the Supreme Court established the elements of a Title VII prima facie case in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, it did not include any element that depended on breaking a contract. [read post]
Employer could not rely on incomplete info to assert honest belief employee was uncooperative in IME
3 Dec 2013, 8:21 am
Because this evidence could not require a juror to conclude that the company discriminated against her, it was circumstantial and properly analyzed under the McDonnell Douglas framework, the court concluded. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:00 am
[ix] This idea would later become the Space Shuttle, but it would only take shape after NASA solicited designs from aerospace companies like Lockheed, McDonnell Douglas, General Dynamics, and North American Rockwell. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:50 pm
LSI Corp. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:00 am
As an undergraduate, he served in the Air Force Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) while earning bachelor's degrees in physics and mechanical engineering. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:08 am
Therefore, to survive a Motion for Summary Judgment, Ruggles was required to establish a circumstantial case under a burden shifting framework that the United States Supreme Court set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
When there is no direct evidence of discrimination, plaintiffs can make use of the pretext model established by the Supreme Court in 1973 in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 2:34 am
Curtiss-Wright Corp., 204 N.J. 239 (N.J. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:33 am
If you have direct evidence, the court can dispense with the well-known McDonnell-Douglas burden-shifting model that helps the court decide if circumstantial evidence is enough to prove your case. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 11:00 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1978) 87 CA3d 626, 647-648; 151 CR 399, 410] There are many ways for Judge Mayhew to handle Issue 1. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:27 pm
-- Turner v McKesson Corp, Case No. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:31 am
McDonnell Douglas Corp. (1988) 216 Cal.App.3d 388, 421. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:18 pm
Numerous cases since McDonnell Douglas have held that the prima facie case formula is flexible and must be flexible. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
” In Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
The following case is published below with my own commentary added in the blue fields. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm
McDonnell Douglas Corp., supra, 87 Cal.App.3d 626, and Kadelbach v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Mikitish, Douglas K. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
” McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
In such a case, the disciplinary action is subject to the burden-shifting analysis articulated by the United States Supreme Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
