Search for: "Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 130
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2018, 2:16 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 The Second Amended Complaint added named Defendants, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Corp. and Intervet, Inc., and fourteen causes of action. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 The Dutch court's reasoning in the parallel case was consistent with the English Court (save they actually granted the relief sought, whereas Kitchin J held that the case for the declaration was arguable) (see Merck Sharpe & Dohme Manufacturing v Ratiopharm Nederland BV and others - February 13 2008 case number/docket number 288241/ HA ZA 07-1689).A new mantra for those clearing the path? [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 6:00 pm by Duncan
 Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Supreme Court in the next term.Africa Correspondent Chijioke Okorie reports on Raconteur Productions Limited v Dioni VisionsEntertainment Limited and 2 Others, heard before the Lagos Division of the Federal High Court of Nigeria, concerning the possibility of copyright infringement of a ‘screenplay’, which is not specifically mentioned or defined in the Nigerian Copyright Act as a protected work.Platform Liability -Former GuestKat Mirko Brüß examines another case referred… [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 12:52 am
The Court of Appeal clarified in Merck v Merck Sharpe & Dohme [2017] EWCA Civ 1834. that this targeting should be considered on an objective basis. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:03 am by CoL .net
(I will have to go away and read Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA (2021) 1 SLR 1102 properly.) [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:30 am
(Patent Docs) Atripla (Emtricitabine) - US: District Court S D New York: Patent infringement suit filed following a Paragraph IV Certification: Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. et al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Elizabeth McCuskey has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s argument in Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by John J. Sullivan
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., ATL-L-9169-11, ALT-L-9166-11; ATL-L-9142-11; ATL-L-9168-11; ATL-L-9157-011, at 3 (N.J. [read post]
The Patentees filed two PTE applications, each of which was based on different goods on the ARTG: Brand Name OPDIVO® KEYTRUDA® Active ingredient nivolumab pembrolizumab Australian sponsor Bristol-Myers Squibb Australia Pty Ltd Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd Relationship between sponsor and patentees Related to one of the patentees Not related to either patentee Date goods containing the drug were first included on ARTG 11 January 2016 16 April 2015… [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:26 am by Mark Theodore
In Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., 367 NLRB No. 122 (May 7, 2019), the employer has 23,000 employees in the United States, approximately 2700 of whom are represented by various unions in different plants. [read post]