Search for: "Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 130
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 8:20 am by Brenda Fulmer
The Panel also heard argument from both sides regarding the establishment of MDL No. 2331, involving the hair loss drug Propecia (also knowzoloft, propecia, n as finasteride) and defendants Merck & Co. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:20 am by Brenda Fulmer
The Panel also heard argument from both sides regarding the establishment of MDL No. 2331, involving the hair loss drug Propecia (also knowzoloft, propecia, n as finasteride) and defendants Merck & Co. and Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Margaret Thatcher's birth place in Grantham  Source Wikipedia According to Wikiquote, "frit" is an unusual Lincolnshire dialect abbreviation of 'frightened' which Mrs Thatcher evidently recalled from her Grantham childhood. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:42 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) R. v SVS Solicitors [2012] EWCA Crim 319 (15 February 2012) A v B & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 285 (14 March 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Maqsood v Mahmood & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 251 (13 March 2012) JD (Congo) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 327 (16 March 2012) Barr & Ors v Biffa Waste Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 312 (19 March 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Travelers Insurance… [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:16 am
Judge Birss QC assures us that his decision in Merck Sharp Dohme Corp & Anor v Teva Pharma BV & Anor [2012] EWHC 627 (Pat), relating to an application by Bristol-Myers Squibb for an interim injunction pending trial, raises no issue of principle, but he does provide an enlightening discussion of how to address some issues of fact that are common in an application for a quia timet injunction, including a review of the European case law. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 3:06 pm by Tom Lamb
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., ATL-L-3394-11 (MT), which is currently ongoing in a New Jersey state court, with Judge Carol Higbee presiding -- that the osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) which Mrs. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 7:42 pm by FDABlog HPM
Karst –       Among the Warning Letters FDA posted on its website this week, one in particular caught our attention – a February 17, 2012 Warning Letter to Merck Sharp and Dohme Corp. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:45 am by John J. Sullivan
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., ATL-L-9169-11, ALT-L-9166-11; ATL-L-9142-11; ATL-L-9168-11; ATL-L-9157-011, at 3 (N.J. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:02 am by Tom Lamb
Three More Lawsuits (Boles, Jellema, and Spano) Set For Trial, And A Special Master Appointed To Conduct Settlement Talks (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) There are currently more than 900 Fosamax lawsuits pending against defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 1:42 pm
With the consent of the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and defendant Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., the Court hereby appoints John D. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:20 am by igorodetski
Prescription drug maker Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed an action against Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway challenging the legality and fairness of the arrangement in which a state attorney general hires private attorneys on a contingency fee basis to handle suits on behalf of the state. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:20 pm
Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme BV, and Merck Sharp & Dohme and Paranova Danmark A/S and Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Merck Sharp & Dohme and Merck Sharp & Dohme BV is only available on the Curia website in a random selection of official European Union languages that does not include Maltese, Bulgarian or English, but the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08 April 2011) High… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:43 am
In my article "Divided by a common language: US and UK patent law" which was published in Science, People & Politics (April to June 2011) I noted that one of the differences between US and UK patent law was that 35 USC 102 (b) of the US act permits an application for a US patent even where the invention has been described in a publication or application for a foreign patent that has been made in [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions… [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:48 am by Layla Kuhl
In Attorney General v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, the Court of Appeals panel majority held that “plaintiffs’ allegations fall within the statutory definition of “product liability  action,”  because  plaintiffs  have  asserted  legal  and  equitable  theories  of  liability  for damage to property resulting from the production of a product. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:45 pm by Editors
Conference Highlights include: * More than 8 CLE credits including 1.5 ethics * Networking sessions and small group discussions * Tracks that guide you through the issues and information you should be familiar with as you take on this new role * Presenters include in-house counsel (or corporate counsel) representing companies and legal departments including Comcast Corp., Exelon, Fifth Third Bank, Verizon Wireless, Harrah’s Entertainment , Prudential Financial, Inc.,… [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 5:52 am
Cefetra and others – parties settle (EPLAW) UK: EWCA hands down judgment on appeal in Medeva's SPC application: Medeva BV v Comptroller General of Patents (SPC blog) (SPC blog) (IPKat) UK: Parallels, paranova, packaging and paramnesia: Paranova Danmark A/S, Paranova Pack A/S v Merck Sharp &Dohme Corp. [read post]