Search for: "Michael Sinclair"
Results 101 - 120
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2020, 8:00 am
” Sinclair v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:58 am
Whether Congress will remain on the sidelines on big (by broadcast standards) mergers like the ill-fated Sinclair Broadcast Group-Tribune Media deal is an open question. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:30 pm
The respondent in the case, Michael Blaine Shatzer, Sr., was convicted of sexually abusing his three-year-old son. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm
White, Using Skidmore to Dance Around the Chevron Two-Step: “Sinclair Wyoming Ref. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
Given the Canadian Governments review of copyright law Michael Geist analyses the Canadian Heritage Committee’s Hearing on these matters, in particular that of Music Canada’s contribution. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm
And more importantly, as Upton Sinclair said so many years ago, “It is difficult to get a man [sic] to understand something, when his [sic] salary depends on his [sic] not understanding it. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm
With bipartisan support, the law was hailed as a milestone, one of the most significant changes in food regulation since Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” exposed sordid conditions in the meatpacking industry at the turn of the last century, triggering the first federal food laws. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm
Kannon Shanmugam of Paul Weiss is in the bar section, while Michael Dreeben, a former deputy U.S. solicitor general now with O’Melveny and Georgetown University Law Center, takes a seat in the public gallery. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
In what seems to be the first case to consider the this section in an application for an interlocutory injunction, charity boss Michael Meegan failed in his attempt to restrain publication by the Irish Mail on Sunday of allegations that he had made inappropriate sexual advances to males in Kenya: Kearns P held that the newspaper had shown a reasonable defence to any libel action, and that there was no suggestion the defendant was not a “mark” for damages should any libel action… [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
[discussion of use of design patents to protect shoes] Michael Heller (Columbia Law School) Fashion in academic book conferences: which books get chosen? [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Carter is hard to square with commentators and precedent and the logic of the law. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
CANADA - Results by design: the artefactual construction of high recidivism rates for sex offenders.
17 Apr 2008, 2:21 am
View the article here01/01/2006Publication: Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal JusticeAuthor: Webster, Cheryl Marie ; Gartner, Rosemary ; Doob, Anthony N.IntroductionDespite the persistent notion that sex offenders have a lasting--perhaps even incurable--propensity to commit further sexual offences, this belief has not been borne out by empirical studies (see, e.g., Hanson and Bussiere 1998; Hanson and Monton-Bourgon 2004). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 11:46 am
Michael and family convince Ellen that she needs to get away and she flies down to the Bahamas with them. [read post]
28 May 2013, 10:03 pm
They somewhat amusingly likened my article to what they call another work of fantasy, Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Blake, the figure Dickie Scruggs apparently spoke about in the book Assuming the Risk, by Michael Orey, when he referred to "the dark side of the force" aiding Scruggs in litigation? [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Michael D. [read post]
