Search for: "Microsoft Corporation et al"
Results 101 - 120
of 223
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Steve Szentesi & Mark Katz (First published in Competition Policy International, Antitrust Chronicle) “As a result of this alleged conspiracy, we believe that consumers paid millions of dollars more for some of the most popular titles. [read post]
18 May 2012, 4:49 pm
Microsoft Corporation, et al. and Sun-Rype Products Ltd., et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am
., et al. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
Skadden, Arps et al Sidley Auston LLP Time Warner US Department of State Debevoise & Plimpton National Amusements Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:48 am
Skadden, Arps et al Sidley Auston LLP Time Warner US Department of State Debevoise & Plimpton National Amusements Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:27 am
Skadden, Arps et al Sidley Auston LLP Time Warner US Department of State Debevoise & Plimpton National Amusements Inc. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am
Steel Investment Canada Case On November 24, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada denied leave in United States Steel Corporation et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 9:13 am
Microsoft Corporation, et al. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
… Every Disruptive Technology has caused a reaction like Jack Valenti’s by the Corporations involved. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
” In truth, however, the bill addresses a wish list for large corporate interests. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Brief for the New York Intellectual Property Law Association Brief for Microsoft Corporation, EMC Corporation, and Intel Corporation Brief for Association Internationale Pour La Protection De La Propriété Intellectuelle et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court Columbia: Record breaking… [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:48 am
Bell Canada, et al concerning scope of Copyright Board powers (Excess Copyright) NHL’s Montreal Canadiens accused of pirating The Hurt Locker (TorrentFreak) Europe ECJ’s Interflora ruling: Google the real winner? [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:46 am
SAP America, Inc., et. al. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am
Travelocity.com LP, et. al. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:52 am
The conclusion of the CAFC in Classen v Biogen, et al [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 1:16 pm
See, e.g., Bryant-Kutcher et al, Taxes and Financial Assets: Valuing Permanently Reinvested Foreign Earnings , National Tax Journal (arguing from a corporatist position that the US worldwide tax system 'forces' companies to reinvest in financial assets, which really isn't good for their businesses). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Acer, et al. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
The Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. [read post]
