Search for: "Miller et al v. Miller" Results 101 - 120 of 682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
New PatentlyO L.J. Article: The AIA at Ten – How Much Do the Pre-AIA Prior Art Rules Still Matter?
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
New PatentlyO L.J. Article: The AIA at Ten – How Much Do the Pre-AIA Prior Art Rules Still Matter?
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm by Jason Rantanen
Post-AIA (Point Estimate) We thank LaTia Brand of Harrity Analytics and the Stanford NPE Database, described in Shawn Miller et al., Who’s Suing Us? [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Is Settling a Bond Claim in the Face of a Seemingly Clear Statute of Limitations Defense Bad Faith?
16 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm by Christopher G. Hill
Ransgate Corp., et. al. looked at claims for indemnity by a surety and the principal/indemnitors in the event that the Surety settled such a claim. [read post]
Construction Law Musings - https://constructionlawva.com/
First District Holds CEQA Special Legislation For Oakland Howard Terminal Project (AB 734) Did Not Incorporate AB 900 Guidelines’ Deadline For Governor Certification; Governor Newsom’s Certification of Project As Qualifying For Expedited Judicial Review Was Timely
16 Aug 2021, 3:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Pacific Merchant Shipping Association, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Addresses CEQA Statute of Limitations And Tolling Agreement Rules In Affirming Judgment Upholding EBRPD’s Approval of Tree Removal MOU With PG&E
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Save Lafayette Trees, et. al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Flunking CEQA’s “Fair Argument” Test: Third District Affirms Judgment Upholding MND for El Dorado County Bridge Replacement Project, Rejects Arguments Based on Alleged Significant Impacts on Fire Evacuation Routes During Construction As Insufficient To Require EIR
21 Jun 2021, 8:55 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Newtown Preservation Society, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Some Work Cannot be Included in a Miller Act Claim
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
Construction Law Musings - https://constructionlawva.com/
Some Work Cannot be Included in a Miller Act Claim
2 Jun 2021, 8:15 am by Christopher G. Hill
  In Dickson v Forney Enterprises, Inc. et. al., the Court looked at the question of whether costs of a project manager’s purely clerical duties can be included and correspondingly whether performing those duties can extend the relevant one-year limitations period for filing suit. [read post]
Construction Law Musings - http://constructionlawva.com
Sixth District Affirms Judgment Dismissing CEQA Action For Failure To Timely Join Indispensable Real Party Within Limitations Period Triggered By Filing of Second, Valid NOD; Court Rejects Plaintiff’s Arguments Based On Relation Back, Estoppel, and City’s Violation of Statute Requiring It To Mail Operative NOD
1 Jun 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Jose (Microsoft Corporation, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 783. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Summaries Sunday: Supreme Advocacy
23 May 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
Ghotra, 2020 ONCA 373, 2021 SCC 12 (39215) The Chief Justice: “We are all of the view to dismiss the appeal for the reasons of Justice Miller of the Ontario Court of Appeal. [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca
Is More Litigation the Remedy for Meritless CEQA Litigation? Fourth District Concludes Malicious Prosecution Action Against Losing CEQA Plaintiffs Survives Anti-SLAPP Motion
17 May 2021, 10:27 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Jan Dunning, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
FALLS ROAD COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, et al. v. ARTHUR BECKER, et al.
26 Apr 2021, 6:28 am by Daily Record Staff
Zoning — Safety concerns — Collateral estoppel This appeal concerns the efforts of appellees, Arthur Becker, Nancy Miller, and Gaylord Brooks Realty (collectively referred to as “the developer”), to construct homes on a large tract of land located in Baltimore County. [read post]
On the Record - http://thedailyrecord.com/ontherecord/
Ohio Domicile: Taxpayer could have prevailed with simple affidavit
25 Mar 2021, 8:35 am by Buckingham
Al.), v. [read post]
Ohio State Tax Blog - http://ohiostatetaxblog.com/
The Coordinated Attack on Trans Student Athletes
26 Feb 2021, 12:59 pm by ACLU
For updates on Andraya’s case, visit the Soule et al v. [read post]
American Civil Liberties Union Blog of Rights - https://www.aclu.org/blog
Kean Miller Wins Important Louisiana Appellate Court Victory Striking Down Corporation Income Tax Regulation
14 Jan 2021, 7:25 am by Jason Brown, Michael McLoughlin and William Kolarik
., Inc. v. [read post]
Louisiana Law Blog - http://www.louisianalawblog.com/
A “Fare” Shake? Ninth Circuit Affirms Judgment On the Pleadings for San Francisco In Removed Action Challenging SFMTA’s 2018 Taxi Regulations, Remands for Consideration of Whether to Grant Plaintiffs Leave to Amend CEQA Claim
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  San Francisco Taxi Coalition, et al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Keeping the “Golden Door” Cracked Open: California Supreme Court Extends Period to Consider Review of CEQA Administrative Record Case
26 Oct 2020, 9:34 am by Arthur F. Coon
On October 23, 2020, the California Supreme Court issued an order extending until December 7, 2020, or the date upon which review is either granted or denied, the time for granting or denying review in Golden Door Properties, LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Dismisses Appeal In CEQA Case As Moot Where Plaintiff Failed To Timely Seek Or Obtain Preliminary Injunction And Project Construction Was Completed Before Trial
21 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Placer (Silversword Properties, LLC, et al., Real Parties in Interest) (2020) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Hitting A CEQA Snag: Third District Affirms Rejection of Statutory Road Abandonment And Brown Act Challenges And Inverse Condemnation Claim, But Holds Placer County Violated CEQA By Adopting Addendum To Wrong Project’s EIR
4 Sep 2020, 4:35 pm by Arthur F. Coon
County of Placer, et al. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Burnishing the “Golden Door”: Fourth District Modifies Recent Opinion Requiring Lead Agency Preservation of CEQA Administrative Record Documents, Denies Petitions for Rehearing and Leaves Judgment Unchanged
26 Aug 2020, 10:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
Superior Court of San Diego (County of San Diego, et al, Real Parties in Interest) (4th Dist. 2010) ____ Cal.App.5th ____. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com