Search for: "Mr. Humphrey"
Results 101 - 120
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
How well do you know Watergate? [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 7:14 pm
Humphrey 13-1345 Issue: (1) Whether it is error for a federal appellate court to undertake the same analysis for penalty phase prejudice in capital cases arising from both weighing states, where juries impose death sentences only after determining that aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating factors, and non-weighing states, where juries are instructed that they may return a sentence less than death for any reason or no reason at all, even after finding a statutory aggravator; and (2)… [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
Humphrey 13-1345Issue: (1) Whether it is error for a federal appellate court to undertake the same analysis for penalty phase prejudice in capital cases arising from both weighing states, where juries impose death sentences only after determining that aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating factors, and non-weighing states, where juries are instructed that they may return a sentence less than death for any reason or no reason at all, even after finding a statutory aggravator; and (2)… [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
Mr Bryce did not argue otherwise although, as already noted, he may have been putting the arguments into slightly different compartments. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:48 am
Mr. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:33 am
“It is something that a prosecutor would have to take into account,” said Mr Blakely. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To the contrary, I think that Mr. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm
To the contrary, I think that Mr. [read post]
1 May 2014, 10:56 am
Still, unless Mr. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 6:42 am
"Absolutely everything" according to Gordon Humphreys, unless it relates to criminal activities or public interest matters and provided that "CTMs or RCDs are involved in some way". [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
Mr. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 6:10 pm
Taking these one by one, there are three very basic things to be learned from what has happened to Mr. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 3:47 am
Mr. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:00 pm
Humphrey....Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 6:50 am
In this week’s case (Plishka-Humphreys v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
