Search for: "Nordstrom, Inc. " Results 101 - 120 of 137
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2009, 3:52 pm by Kenneth Vercammen NJ Law Blog
KENNETH VERCAMMEN, ESQ.RECENT SPEAKING ENGAGEMENTS ON WILLS, ELDER LAW, AND PROBATEEast Brunswick Adult School 2009, 2008Middlesex County Police Chiefs 2009- Living WillsMiddlesex County College- Wills & Probate 2007Edison Adult School -Wills, Elder Law & Probate- 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002 [inc Edison TV], 2001, 2000,1999,1998,1997 - Nuts & Bolts of Elder Law - NJ Institute for Continuing Legal Education/ NJ State Bar ICLE/NJSBA 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004,… [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione Emilia-Romagna (IPKat) CFI clarifies… [read post]
10 May 2009, 11:29 pm
Nordstrom, Inc., Opposition No. 91177858 (October 23, 2008), another Board panel ruled that correction of a false statement after registration but before challenge creates a rebuttable presumption that the registrant "did not intend to deceive the Office. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:07 am by Bill Heinze
Nordstrom, Inc., Opposition No. 91177858 (October 23, 2008) [not precedential]. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Palm Beach Division, Nordstrom, Inc. agreed to pay $292,500 in damages to 10 former employees. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:18 pm by Bill Heinze
Nordstrom, Inc., Opposition No. 91177858 (October 23, 2008) [not precedential]. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:45 am
Nordstrom, Inc., Opposition No. 91177858 (October 23, 2008) [not precedential].Applicant Nordstrom counterclaimed for cancellation of five registrations asserted by Opposer Zanella in its notice of opposition. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Nordstrom, Inc. will pay $292,500 to 10 former employees and furnish other remedial measures to settle a harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:51 am
Days before the case was scheduled to go to trial, national department store chain Nordstrom, Inc., opted to settle the Title VII lawsuit brought against it by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in which the EEOC alleged Nordstrom violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by subjecting Hispanic and black employees to racial and ethnic slurs. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
(IP Think Tank) (The IP ADR Blog) (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) 50 years of scientific discovery and sharing in Antarctica may end thanks to patent greed (Techdirt) Take steps to limit the impact of licensee’s economic woes (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia TMO delegate allows ‘ElvisFinance’ covering financial services to proceed to registration despite opposition: Elvis Presley Enterprises Inc v Elvis Jelcic (Australian Trade Marks… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:04 am
How is this possible for a small company to stand up to a behemoth like Nordstrom for $70,000? [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:04 pm
Citing a Cato Institute newsletter, it accuses Seattle-based Nordstrom, Inc. [read post]