Search for: "PARTY X v. PARTY Y"
Results 101 - 120
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am
The notice also included certain conditions (eventually deemed “commercially reasonable” by Justice Borrok) that the purchasing member assume any guarantees given by the selling member of loans made by third-party lenders to PTP. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
Accueillie en partie (13 940 $). [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 10:00 am
If an appellate opinion says that X is not a violation, but Y or Z probably would be, how much precedential weight does that carry in future cases involving Y or Z? [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Many of these examples are more about association or dilution than confusion—this person stood for X and is being used for Y. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:21 am
Judges are specifically cautioned against delivering a decision before they have fully considered their reasons – precisely because a judge can be clear in her mind that she is going to do X, but the process of analysing and setting out the evidence and applying the law can reveal that X was in fact the wrong answer – and thus the decision will be Y. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
” Basically, it is saying that your bills say you did X, but you really only did Y, and Medicare paid more as a result. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 12:12 am
A Swiss type claim (the terminology used by the Court in this case, although they are also known as ‘Swiss-style’ or simply ‘Swiss’ claims) is generally of the form: ‘Use of [compound X] for the manufacture of a medicament for treatment of [condition Y]. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
A court may even decline to order costs to minimize conflict between parents (see Aubin v Aubin, 2010 BCSC 1425). [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
I am quite excited by the exchange between Jack and Chris Green about the meaning of the oath of fidelity to the Constitution. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
” Miller v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
In Benton v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Ray Harron, did not have a patient-physician relationship such that a patient injured as a result of the screening could sue him for malpractice.[13] The plaintiff had received a chest X-ray in a mass screening that resulted from a law firm solicitation. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
App’x 914, 919 (11th Cir. 2014) (defendant “did not conceive or begin to i [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:26 am
Long v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
” That royalty is no pittance: In Hughes Aircraft v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
What do you do when Employer fires Employee for (allegedly discriminatory) Reason X and then, during the litigation, discovers that Employee had done something totally wrong (Reason Y; e.g., faking his resume, stealing company property, etc) that would absolutely justify firing the guy? [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 1:19 pm
Plaintiff sues because the defendant allegedly caused a third party to "break up" with her. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Key Findings The Maryland General Assembly is on the verge of adopting a vaguely worded, legally dubious tax on digital advertising in the final days of this session—now paired with new tobacco taxes. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 1:33 pm
X amount is for tuition and the tuition balance is Y. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 9:46 am
A typical modification clause says something like this: Upon the affirmative vote of holders of not less than X% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, the issuer may modify, amend, or supplement the terms of the Bonds; provided, however, that no such action may, without the consent of holders X+Y% in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds, reduce the principal amount of any Bond. [read post]
