Search for: "Pam Samuelson"
Results 101 - 120
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 12:11 pm
-Patently-O, July 19, 2011 by Robert Merges, Pam Samuelson, and Ted Sichelman http://bit.ly/dc4GOo The 2008 Berkeley Patent Survey has found that startups are patenting more than previous studies have suggested; that patents are being sought for a variety of reasons, the most prominent of which is to prevent copying of the innovation; and that there are considerable [...] [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
., Pam Samuelson) have argued that intellectual property holds lessons for privacy. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:11 pm
Most work focuses on one area or is theoretical or anecdotal, with a few exceptions attempting empirical categorization—Beebe analyzing what courts say about the factors, Pam Samuelson’s policy-relevant clusters—taking perspectives internal to the case. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 6:10 am
First, examples of these critiques: In Friday's Patently-O post, Professors Robert Merges, Pam Samuelson, and Ted Sichelman defend their Berkeley Patent Study from the criticism that it "is typical of other flawed 'scholarship' on patents by academics. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 4:25 am
The underlying meaning of the word "patent," as distinct from the word latent, is a tip-off.In the context of a paper about patents ("Berkeley Patent Study"), authors Robert Merges, Pam Samuelson, and Ted Sichelman presented the rather (shocking) statement at Patently-O:To make further inferences, especially without access to the underlying data in the study—which we cannot make publicly available due to confidentiality restrictions—will almost… [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:31 am
Pamela Samuelson is the Richard M. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:28 am
My questions: what’s your response to the strategic/interpretive claim that fair use is not as uncertain as all that, made by the Best Practices folks and by people like Pam Samuelson who group cases, or even in Beebe and Sag’s empirical research? [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:19 am
Pam Samuelson of Berkeley Law and her team. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:02 am
* The Copyright Principles Project, a 3 year effort led by Pam Samuelson, has released its report and recommendations. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:03 am
Closing Plenary Session Christopher Buccafusco, Chicago-Kent College of Law & Christopher Sprigman, Virginia The Creativity Effect Interested in work on endowment effects. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:47 am
Pam Samuelson: legislative changes/courts v. legislators? [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:00 am
It's a particular honour to be named this year together with Pam Samuelson, who has been a huge supporter of CIPPIC, Susan Crawford, and Nina Paley. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 1:58 pm
U.S. law professor Pam Samuelson chronicles precisely what happened in her 1997 law review article, The U.S. [read post]
28 May 2010, 9:50 pm
Pam Samuelson: Aim: policy levers to make user innovation more lawful. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm
Pam Samuelson's letter to Judge Chin, to which I referred, saw this coming and suggests that the lawyers for the subclass of authors should ask that the settlement terms be reconsidered or, failing this, that the Court should refuse to approve the the settlement until the class is redefined.Although the parties must surely have foreseen this possibility, who knows what further unintended and unforeseen consequences may transpire? [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:29 pm
HT to Pam. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 10:14 pm
As well, there are “must read” submissions from Pam Samuelson and many notable advocacy groups on all sides, and corporate interests, including Microsoft and AT&T.There is no doubt that Judge Chin will have his hands full with this case, and they eyes of the entire copyright world will be focussed on him. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 11:05 am
Pam Samuelson has done a great public service in presenting a host of reasons why the settlement may be contrary to the interests of some authors it purports to protect, particularly academics (including a forthcoming symposium article in the Minnesota Law Review!). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 9:30 am
Here's Pam Samuelson's clear but sophisticated analysis of whether to opt out. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:24 pm
However, DOJ cites no copyright statutory damages cases in support of this argument, and in fact the labels argued in their brief in defense of the Thomas-Rasset award of $1.92 million ($80,000 per work) that a court does not have the authority to reduce a jury's award of statutory damages under the common law.For more background on the constitutionality of copyright statutory damages awards, please refer to this online debate I did a few months ago with Professor Pam… [read post]
