Search for: "Physician Review Services Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 12:33 pm by John Elwood
The justices turned down the petition for review earlier this year in Arlene’s Flowers Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 9:19 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
As PHI Vendors also could face exposure from service providers, this review should include assessment of those compliance risks and exposures. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
The entirety of the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the amount of attorney's fees and costs awarded to Michael was: The [c]ourt, having reviewed all of the services provided, and finding the time spent and rates reasonable per the [Rules of Professional Conduct], awards the petitioner the sum of $89,380.91 in fees and costs. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Time Inc., Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., and the test for confusion under s. 6 of the Trademarks Act. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm by Vercammen Law
In its definitional provision, this Act defined the residents of "a dementia care home" as adults "with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders or other forms of dementia," who also: are "ambulant with or without assistive devices"; have been "certified by a licensed physician . . . not in need of skilled nursing care"; and "except in the case of a person 65 years of age or over, [are] in need of dietary services, supervision of… [read post]
The Agreement requires UCI to retain an Independent Review Organization to perform a periodic claims review and states that the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General will routinely monitor UCI. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 6:33 pm by Matt Pulle
Firstar Fin., Inc., 409 F.3d 286, 295-296 (6th Cir. 2005) In Calvert, the Sixth Circuit said that, while there is nothing inherently objectionable about a plan administrator using a file review of a claimant’s medical evidence, a plan administrator’s decision to conduct a file review, instead of a physical examination, is a “factor to consider in [the court’s] overall assessment of whether [plan administrator] acted in an arbitrary and capricious… [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 6:33 pm by Matt Pulle
Firstar Fin., Inc., 409 F.3d 286, 295-296 (6th Cir. 2005) In Calvert, the Sixth Circuit said that, while there is nothing inherently objectionable about a plan administrator using a file review of a claimant’s medical evidence, a plan administrator’s decision to conduct a file review, instead of a physical examination, is a “factor to consider in [the court’s] overall assessment of whether [plan administrator] acted in an arbitrary and capricious… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Jane Turner
She retained the services of Minneapolis-based Halunen & Associates. [read post]