Search for: "Property Damage Appraisers, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 220
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2013, 10:01 am
NORMANDY VILLAGE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Injunctions -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Trial court acted within its inherent authority to sanction abusive litigant when it issued omnibus order granting permanent injunction barring future filings relating to foreclosure proceeding or filing future actions arising out of foreclosure proceedings in the circuitLINDSAY JENKINS, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 8:21 am
Following this opinion, the Board updated their appraisal amount for damages to be $16,910,500.00. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm
VISUAL HEALTH AND SURGICAL CENTER, INC., a Florida corporation, ANTONIO BOLET, individually, Et. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 12:53 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Florida likewise stated: This language cannot be stretched to mean that appraisal can be invoked whenever the parties dispute which items of property were damaged or whether those items were in fact damaged by flood waters. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 4:06 am
Colorado case law on property insurance appraisal is sparse. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 7:28 am
On January 14, 2008, the Reynolds (through a real estate appraiser) offered to sell the entire property to Kinder Gas. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:09 am
Zurich American Insurance Company,1 Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal evaluated whether an appraisal award constitutes a "favorable resolution" of an underlying contract dispute for purposes of filing a bad faith lawsuit against the carrier.The property damage at issue was to a shopping center called Trafalgar at Greenacres. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:51 pm
On August 24, two summonses with notice were filed in New York state court against DB Structured Products, Inc. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:00 am
PNS STORES, INC., D/B/A MACFRUGAL'S BARGAIN CLOSEOUTS D/B/A MACFRUGALS, INC. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:01 am
Mary Ann Ochman said she didn't know what was going on with the property until she saw a PennDOT real estate appraiser in the parking lot recently. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:30 am
Association, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 7:58 am
Mazda Canada Inc. is the first case to refer to Lax J. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
The Texas Supreme Court answered that this did not qualify under the policy’s provision covering “bodily injury” or “property damage. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Such contribution may be in cash, property or services rendered or a promissory note or other obligation to contribute cash or property or to render services. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:10 pm
See, e.g., Holiday Inns, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:45 pm
” The county has deposited $1.3 million with the state treasurer for the appraised value of the property being taken. [read post]
10 May 2012, 4:30 am
The Court noted, however, that Excelsior Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
OF FLORIDA, ANDREA LEVINE and STUART KRAMER, Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Action against condominium association for electrical work performed on association's building after plaintiff had obtained judgment for payment against developer -- Error to enter summary judgment for defendant association on basis of affirmative defense that property was under the control of developer and that there was never a contract between plaintiff and association -- Summary judgment was improper… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
The Dormitory Authority of New YorkDocket: 11-922Issue(s): (1) Whether the Fifth Amendment permits a state to deny compensation to an owner for loss of the reasonably probable development potential of a condemned development site taken through eminent domain proceedings, unless the property owner can show that development will come to fruition in the near future; (2) whether, in awarding just compensation under the Fifth Amendment, a state may exclude damages resulting from… [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:20 am
Realty, Inc. v Kisslev-Mazel Realty, LLC, 76 AD3d 661, 664 [2010]), and a purchaser who, having failed to perform due diligence as to the condition of property prior to signing a contract that provides for the sale of real property in "as is" condition, [*3]is bound by the contract despite structural deficiencies she may later discover in the property (see Daly v Kochanowicz, 67 AD3d 78 [2009]). [read post]
