Search for: "Robert S Jaffe"
Results 101 - 120
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2008, 10:10 pm
Here's an excerpt from the linked-to article: Three brothers - John Friede, Robert Friede and Thomas Jaffe - have been feuding since 2005 over the estate of their mother, Evelyn A.J. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:34 pm
Google order that came out, ordering Google to release YouTube user records to Viacom.I'm in the middle of reading Joseph Jaffe's latest book Join the Conversation (disclosure: I have a review copy for the purposes of blogging about the book) and see he anticipated this controversy. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
For Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN), examiners had the benefit of equipment to stabilize the subject's head and a protractor for measuring the angle of onset of nystagmus. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 7:33 am
Mike's "bible" is Jaffe and Lerner. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 1:16 am
Blaine was introduced to the convention by Robert Ingersoll. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
Constantine's department, Suniya S. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
If you would like more information on cerebral palsy please visit our website and as always, if you have any questions please feel free to contact me: E-mail: robert@dioriofirm.com Phone: (888) 456-4658 NEW YORK STATE UCP AFFILIATES UCP affiliates provide direct services to individuals and families with cerebral palsy and other disabilities. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:54 pm
Roberts: The first generalization is: innovation = invention + exploitation. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:51 am
Sep 25, 2007) (NO. 1535, 708/06)Robert S. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 3:04 am
"And just when it appeared that we were turning the corner on Jaffe and Lerner's fallacies, it appears that there will be a whole new front opening up on patents reducing R&D and not being good for anybody (except drug companies). [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
See Robert A. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 6:49 am
Robert Clarke is the person erroneously referred to as George Clarke in Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents.The other blog cites Patrick Doody's "The Patent System is Not Broken" for debunking the 97% number, although Doody's paper is mainly about patent academics repeating the (mis)analysis of Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents (and consequences thereof). [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 7:07 am
A post by Noel Le at weblog.ipcentral.info, titled Innovation is Not That Discontent, indicates that there is a new version of Innovation and Its Discontents with a new preface.Le suggests that Jaffe and Lerner are pushing issues with patent administration and patent quality.IPBiz wonders if the new version corrects the misnaming of Robert Clarke as "George" Clarke or the references to Rochelle "Dreyfus. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 1:42 am
Maybe it's only in Baltimore.Separately, for those who remember page 144 of Innovation and Its Discontents by Jaffe and Lerner, which discussed the (allegedly) incompetent handling of prior art to the '811 patent by the USPTO, it was indeed Aharonian who first made the (incorrect) allegation, which has now grown into an urban legend. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 10:21 am
To this day, Lemley and Moore never corrected the false statement they made about Robert Clarke (that's "George" Clarke to readers of Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents).In its comments on proposed rules changes on continuing applications, the USPTO cited the wrong page of the Lemley and Moore article.See articles in Kent-JIP andwww.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/dapp/opla/comments/fpp_continuation/ebert2.pdf [read post]
23 May 2007, 5:14 pm
Note that page 133 of the NAS report cites Jaffe and Lerner's Innovation and Its Discontents [Jaffe, A. and J. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 8:33 am
At least, they got Clarke's first name right, unlike Jaffe and Lerner, who refernced George Clarke. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:45 am
"] Second, investigation of the method of Quillen and Webster by Robert Clarke (misidentified as George Clarke by Jaffe and Lerner in footnote 163 at page 222) showed the method was inaccurate. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:59 am
It's time for scientists to speak up when something's not right--, two more relevant topics have arisen.#1. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 6:07 am
"It's nearly impossible to go through a divorce and have it not impact your work life," said Karen McDonald, Casey's divorce attorney and a partner at the law firm of Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss PC in Southfield, Mich. [read post]
