Search for: "Robert V. Lloyd" Results 101 - 120 of 212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:46 am by Anthony McCain
Get a Job doing Patent Law Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Roberts Mlotkowski Safran & Cole Saliwanchik, Lloyd & Eisenschenk Shook, Hardy & Bacon Jones Robb [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark David Fontaine In this day and age, the members of the boards of directors of most companies understand that cybersecurity issues are both important and should be a board-level priority. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling of 18 November 2015, is one of those decisions that looks as though it ought to be quite exciting because of its celebrity content but which actually has little or nothing to entertain the reader. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Marc Hodak, earlier] Another big courtroom reverse for SEC in use of in-house administrative law judges [Reuters] Judge Easterbrook on competitive federalism, Delaware, and incorporation [Robert Goddard, Corporate Law and Governance quoting Corre Opportunities Fund, LP v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm by Giles Peaker
I refer to the relevant principles as to waiver by election (which unlike promissory estoppel is always final, not suspensory, in effect) in Motor Oil (Hellas) Corinth Refineries v Shipping Corporation of India [1990] 1 Lloyds Law Reports 391. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
  There was an opinion piece by Robert Sharp in the Herald. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 11:54 am by J
Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance [1984] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 608 and para.11-094 of Woodfall); (d)  further and in any event, one insured against risks, not particular causes of the risk (Enlayde Ltd v Roberts [1917] 1 Ch 109). [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]