Search for: "Roger D. Rose"
Results 101 - 110
of 110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Rose U. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Wellesley, MA; Paula D'alessandro, President) Beks, Inc. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
Then: JIM (CONT’D) A picture speaks a thousand words. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
Ashmore – @kcashmore1 Jason Augustine – @augustinelaw Brandy Harman Austin @thebrandyaustin, @brandyaustinlaw Steve Autry – @autry13 Kencade Babb – @kencadeb Ann Massey Badmus – @annbadmus Bill Bailey – @bbaileylaw David Bailey – @dabjd Leigh Bailey – @leigh_bailey Trina McReynolds Bailey – @trinamcrey Lindley Bain – @lindleybain Lee Baldwin – @leebaldwin55 Marissa Balius – @marissabalius Katie Bandy – @bandykatherine,… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
He did not mention that, during the Clinton administration, Senate Republicans pocket filibustered five of President Clinton’s nominations to the Fourth Circuit, resulting in a doubling of Fourth Circuit vacancies, which rose from two to five. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 6:38 am
Ashmore – @kcashmore1 Jason Augustine – @augustinelaw Brandy Harman Austin @thebrandyaustin, @brandyaustinlaw Steve Autry – @autry13 Kencade Babb – @kencadeb Ann Massey Badmus – @annbadmus Bill Bailey – @bbaileylaw David Bailey – @dabjd Leigh Bailey – @leigh_bailey Trina McReynolds Bailey – @trinamcrey Lindley Bain – @lindleybain Lee Baldwin – @leebaldwin55 Marissa Balius – @marissabalius Katie Bandy – @bandykatherine,… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:25 pm
Chris Coons (D-Del.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), who introduced the bipartisan Facial Recognition Technology Warrant Act this past November, will join Brookings experts Darrell M. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-149, before Judge Owen, in which "John Doe" defendants represented by Ray Beckerman and Ty Rogers brought motions to (a) vacate the ex parte discovery order on the ground that it had not been supported by competent evidence of a prima facie copyright infringment case, (b) quash the subpoena on that ground plus the additional ground [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:34 am
(d); Civ. [read post]
