Search for: "Samsung Electronics America" Results 101 - 120 of 325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2016, 6:59 am by Docket Navigator
" Petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., CBM2014-00190 (PTAB May 26, 2016, Order) (Elluru, APJ) [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:15 am by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, on October 14, 2011, Complainants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) filed a motion to strike Apple’s 380-page Notice of Prior Art “on the basis that it failed to comply with Ground Rule 4 and failed to provide Complainants and the Commission Investigative Staff [‘OUII’] with effective notice as to the prior art upon which Respondent… [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:36 pm by Sean Hayes
Porter discussed KORUS FTA and anti-dumping actions against LG Electronics and Samsung by Maytag. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 4:41 pm
., Ltd of Japan and Murata Electronics North America, Inc. of Smyrna, Georgia (collectively, "Murata") filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:29 pm by Alex Gasser
In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainant BTG International and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Apple, Inc., ASUStek Computer, Inc., ASUS Computer International, Inc., Dell Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is OSRAM GmbH of Germany and the Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia, LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea, LG Innotek Co., Ltd. of South Korea, LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood… [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:02 am
-Patent Recipients" list, IFI rounds out the top 20 this way: 1 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 4186 2 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD KR 3515 3 CANON K K JP 2114 4 MICROSOFT CORP 2030 5 INTEL CORP 1776 6 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO LTD JP 1745 7 TOSHIBA CORP JP 1609 8 FUJITSU LTD JP … [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:06 pm by Eric Schweibenz
The complaint alleges that Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey (collectively, “Samsung”), AT&T, Inc. of Dallas, Texas, Best Buy Co., Inc. of Richfield, Minnesota, and BrandsMart USA, Inc. of Hollywood, Florida (all collectively, the “Proposed Respondents”) unlawfully import into the U.S., sell for importation, and/or sell within the U.S. after… [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (PTAB judges as principal officers; retroactive CBM reviews) Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents are Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Shanghai Lenovo Electronic Co. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 1:27 pm by WIMS
Distributors of Electronics Assoc.; Nemours Foundation; Premier, Inc.; Premier Farnell; Resource Media; Samsung; Sprout Creation; Stokes Lawrence; and Wells Fargo. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:42 pm by Eric Schweibenz
   In the Order, ALJ Essex granted a joint motion filed by Complainant AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America and Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., BestBuy.com, LLC, Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, and Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart U.S.A. to terminate the investigation based on a settlement agreement. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:32 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation:  Research In Motion Ltd. of Canada Research In Motion Corp. of Irving, Texas HTC Corporation of Taiwan HTC America, Inc. of Bellevue, Washington LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc. of San Diego, California Motorola Mobility Holdings,… [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (Three good questions): Whether Administrative Patent Judges of the [PTAB] are principal Officers of the United States who must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:36 pm
The investigation is based on a July 31, 2009 complaint filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:05 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) moved for leave to file a supplemental submission in support of their claim constructions regarding one of the patents-in-suit, the ‘877 patent. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:00 pm by Christina Reichert
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Bank of America with allegedly misleading investors about mortgage securities.The Obama Administration overturned the International Trade Commission (ITC) ban on the sale of certain Apple products that allegedly infringed Samsung patents.The Senate confirmed Scott Kieff as a new member of the ITC.The U.S. [read post]