Search for: "Samsung Semiconductor Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 154
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
(ITC Law Blog) Kodak - ITC institutes investigation regarding certain mobile telephones and wireless communication devices featuring digital cameras against RIM, Apple (ITC Law Blog) Microsoft - Microsoft enters into another license with an OSS implementer – this time with I-O Data (SiNApSE) RealNetworks - Beaten and bloodied, Real agrees to settle RealDVD fight (Ars Technica) Samsung - ITC investigation concerning hand held wireless communication devices terminated on basis of… [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
(ITC Law Blog) Kodak - ITC institutes investigation regarding certain mobile telephones and wireless communication devices featuring digital cameras against RIM, Apple (ITC Law Blog) Microsoft - Microsoft enters into another license with an OSS implementer – this time with I-O Data (SiNApSE) RealNetworks - Beaten and bloodied, Real agrees to settle RealDVD fight (Ars Technica) Samsung - ITC investigation concerning hand held wireless communication devices terminated on basis of… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 6:02 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  According to the Order, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. consented to the motion. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:09 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents in this investigation are:  Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Electronics America, Inc.; Samsung International, Inc.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC; Apple Inc.; AsusTek Computer, Inc.; Asus Computer International, Inc.; Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd.; Kingston Technology Co., Inc.; Kingston Technology… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:38 am
Hynix ranks No. 3 in NAND, behind Samsung and Japan's Toshiba Corp.The technology is believed to have been obtained by employees of the South Korean arm of Applied Materials Inc., a U.S. company that makes equipment for chip manufacturers including Samsung, and then passed on to Hynix, according to prosecutors.Santa Clara, California-based Applied Materials said it was aware of the actions by prosecutors and confirmed that its vice president and some employees of… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:38 am
Hynix ranks No. 3 in NAND, behind Samsung and Japan's Toshiba Corp.The technology is believed to have been obtained by employees of the South Korean arm of Applied Materials Inc., a U.S. company that makes equipment for chip manufacturers including Samsung, and then passed on to Hynix, according to prosecutors.Santa Clara, California-based Applied Materials said it was aware of the actions by prosecutors and confirmed that its vice president and some employees of Applied… [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 4:56 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the Commission has identified Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of Korea, Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:05 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) moved for leave to file a supplemental submission in support of their claim constructions regarding one of the patents-in-suit, the ‘877 patent. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:11 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Order, Complainants Spansion, Inc. and Spansion LLC (collectively, “Spansion”) moved to compel Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung International, Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) to produce certain documents, witnesses, information, and… [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
Google (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI finds particular machine: Ex Parte Moyer (12:01 Tuesday) ITC: Initial determination finding violation of section 337 in investigation concerning semiconductor chips following complaint by Rambus against NVIDIA, Asustek, and others (ITC 337 Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple - Apple receives iPad patent on eve of launch date (Daily Dose of IP) Cognex – ITC terminates investigation of Amistar concerning certain machine… [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 12:23 pm
This settlement, a result of numerous actions brought by Rambus against Samsung and other chip manufacturers such as Hynix Semiconductor Inc and Micron Technology, came just before an antitrust trial was scheduled to begin against Samsung in San Francisco. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
Vendio Servs., Inc (GRAY on Claims) ITC issues final determination of no section 337 violation in matter based on complaint of Tessera concerning importation and sale of semiconductor chips (ITC 337 Law Blog) ITC issues public version of opinion finding section 337 violation in certain laser imageable lithographic printing plates investigation commenced in response to complaint by Presstek (ITC 337 Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Lincoln Electric… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:11 am
Samsung Electronics Company Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America Inc. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 12:13 pm
The Commission has identified the following as respondents in this investigation: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. of South Korea Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. of San Jose, California Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC of Richardson, Texas Apple, Inc. of Cupertino, California ASUStek Computer, Inc. of Taiwan ASUS Computer International of Fremont,… [read post]