Search for: "Sears Holdings Corp." Results 101 - 120 of 220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am by Amy Howe
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Therefore, we hold today that a plaintiff who does not read an allegedly inadequate warning cannot maintain a negligent-failure-to-adequately-warn action unless the nature of the alleged inadequacy is such that it prevents him from reading it.Id. at 971.This ruling has been extended to situations where the prescriber fails to read a warning. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
Graffiti on the bathroom wall in the building that housed my undergraduate college’s philosophy department: How does a philosopher treat constipation? [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 8:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Sears Holdings Corp. and Darden Restaurants Inc. made similar decisions earlier this year. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 7:26 am by Bankruptcy Attorney
 The company spun off from Sears Holdings Corp. in 2011, and blames burdensome payments owed to Sears as the reason for reorganizing. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 2:39 pm by Glenn
That Sears may buy some search ad keywords, for example, makes it only slightly more likely (and a consequence of retail competition, not Google) that Macy’s will purchase search ads. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:18 am by MLB
  The article outlines the firm’s longstanding relationship with Sears Holding Corp., some of our significant cases, our part in the founding of the Anti-Defamation League, and the firm’s plans for growth. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:47 pm by Mary Dwyer
Sears Holding Corp.12-268Issue: Whether management officials are (1) subject to exclusion from protection under section 704(a) of Title VII if their actions are within the scope of their official duties (the rule in the Fifth, Eighth, Tenth and Eleventh Circuits); (2) protected under section 704(a) regardless of whether their actions are within the scope of their official duties (the rule in the Sixth and District of Columbia Circuits); or (3) subject to… [read post]