Search for: "Shoe Show, Inc"
Results 101 - 120
of 518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 5:48 am
Garzarelli Food Specialties, Inc., 223 F.3d 61 (2d Cir. 2000).2. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
By Rick Mescher On Monday, May 3, 2019, in the midst of the NBA finals, Kawhi Leonard of the Toronto Raptors filed a lawsuit against Nike, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc., 664 F. [read post]
28 May 2019, 7:35 am
Even more shocking is that the outbreak isn’t showing signs of abating. [read post]
25 May 2019, 11:32 am
CSX Transportation, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2019, 7:55 am
Under Armour Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:36 am
New Mex Canada Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal provided clarity on the sentencing principles in OHSA cases. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:36 am
New Mex Canada Inc., 2019 ONCA 30 (CanLII) [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am
I’ll show myself out. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 7:49 am
Crocs, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:28 pm
The lawsuit named Honeywell International Inc., which years ago bought Allied Signal, a company that had acquired Bendix, which was one of the principal manufacturers of brake-shoe linings in the country. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
” But the unit’s articles and presentations on photo comparison show its practices mirror those used in the studies. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 6:14 am
" In this regard, the Board pointed to four oft-cited cases: In re Covalinski, In re White Rock Distilleries, Inc., Parfums de Coeur Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:10 am
Facebook, Inc. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:34 pm
Joe Singer Shoes. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Accordingly, Converse must show that its mark has acquired distinctiveness, i.e., secondary meaning. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 10:00 pm
For years, sneaker giant Converse, Inc. has sought to protect its brand by claiming trademark rights in its famous Chuck Taylor sneaker. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 1:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was recently tasked with reviewing determinations made by the International Trade Commission (“ITC”) relating to trade infringement claims brought by Converse, Inc. with regard to a number of imported shoes that it alleged infringed on one of its trademarks. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 8:02 am
Samara Bros., Inc., 529 U.S. 205 (2000), the Supreme Court held that a product design (such as a shoe portion) is never inherently distinctive, but that distinctiveness may be acquired and proven with “a showing of secondary meaning” — i.e., that the relevant consumers associate the particular product features with a particular source of goods. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 8:21 pm
An example of this use is AMERICAN GIRL for shoes, see Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
