Search for: "Smith v. Hale" Results 101 - 113 of 113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
But even in criminal proceedings account must be taken of the article 8 rights of the perceived victim: see SN v Sweden, App no 34209/96, 2 July 2002. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:12 am by Dave
In advance of the brace of Court of Appeal hearings on the tenancy deposit scheme (TDS), contained in sections 212-4 and Schedule 10, Housing Act 2004, and after the High Court decision in Draycott & Draycott v Hannells (discussed with additional, important comments here), I have been spurred on to think about the original purpose of the TDS for two reasons: first, because it places the scheme in context (as Baroness Hale, in academic mode, said, "in law, context is… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:12 am by Dave
In advance of the brace of Court of Appeal hearings on the tenancy deposit scheme (TDS), contained in sections 212-4 and Schedule 10, Housing Act 2004, and after the High Court decision in Draycott & Draycott v Hannells (discussed with additional, important comments here), I have been spurred on to think about the original purpose of the TDS for two reasons: first, because it places the scheme in context (as Baroness Hale, in academic mode, said, "in law, context is… [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
As Baroness Hale said in Stack (at [69]), in law "context is everything". [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am by Dave
As Baroness Hale said in Stack (at [69]), in law "context is everything". [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:35 am
Smith and Jack Guenther and the former partnerships of Cox, Smith & Smith; Cox, Smith, Smith, Hale & Guenther; and Cox, Smith, Smith, Hale & Guenther Inc., all predecessors to Cox & Smith Inc. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Their Lordships don’t for example, deal with Hussain, Mowan, Smith v Scott etc in any detail. [read post]