Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 9:22 am
S. 183, 187 (2006) (per curiam) (remanding to agency based on failure by Court of Appeals to "appl[y] the ordinary remand rule" (internal quotation marks omitted)); INS v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
With today's decisions, Justices Jackson, Kagan, and Gorsuch have tied Justice Kavanaugh's mark of three opinions for the Court this term. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
Plaintiff’s accident occurred on August 9, 2017 and the notice of claim was marked as received on November 8, 2017-ninety-one days from the date of plaintiff’s incident. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The claimants argue that the delay in filing the claims resulted from the newspaper’s concealment of its staff’s behaviour. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Tarbert (1987) and Com. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Kupferman’s decision in Celia v Celia (2023 NY Slip Op 30995(U) [Sup Ct, Saratoga County Mar. 31, 2013]). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Australia’s highest court emphatically rejected the relevance of reputation in either the allegedly infringing or infringed mark is relevant to the assessment of deceptive similarity, ruling that PROTOX and “instant BOTOX alternative” do not infringe the registered trade mark BOTOX. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
With Congress’s help, our headcount this year now is approximately three percent larger than in 2016. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:37 am
Ulanov, 2020 IL App (1st) 182501-U For example, in Ulanov v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The issuer’s decision to execute a buyback program constitutes transaction-specific inside information in its possession. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
S. 452, 464 (2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
S. 692, 739–742 (2004) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); Jesner v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Reich, 510 U. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:48 am
For example, plaintiffs allege that there were certain marks left on GinaMarie’s shoes and the tire of GinaMarie’s car, both of which were caused by the electrical strike incident, but their trial attorneys failed to call a forensic expert to establish that these marks were “indicative of contact with high voltage/high amperage electricity” (id. 172). [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 10:52 am
U. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:57 pm
” At some point after Pomerantz’s departure, Bragg seemingly did a U-turn and decided to move forward with charges against Trump after all. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
If the Murphy-Lee resolution passes, it will mark the first time that Congress has requested a report under Section 502B(c) since 1976. [read post]
