Search for: "USC, LLC " Results 101 - 120 of 593
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 6:13 am
Lacaille, State Street Corporation, on Sunday, September 13, 2020 Tags: Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Diversity, Engagement, ESG, Human capital, Institutional voting, Long-Term value, Reputation, SASB The Revival of Large Consulting Practices at the Big 4 and Audit Quality Posted by Eldar Maksymov (Arizona State University), on Monday, September 14, 2020 Tags: Accounting, Audits, Form 8-K, Mergers &… [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 12:20 pm by Silver Law Group
  Grizelle Perez   USC Securities LLC   Sanders Morris Harris LLC   John Wyshak   Raymond James & Associates, Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 6:59 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
  The Hatch-Waxman Patent Term Extension Statute The patent term extension provisions of the Hatch-Waxman Act are set forth in 35 USC § 156. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 5:18 pm by Evan Brown
Native Media, LLC, 2020 WL 3208800 (D. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 2:45 pm by Jake Ward
Should you wish to speak with the registered patent attorneys at Ward Law Office LLC, we invite you to contact us by telephone at 419-408-5500, or by email to info@wardpatent.com. [read post]
31 May 2020, 6:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
En ese caso, Super Interconnect Technologies, LLC (SIT) demandó a Google LLC (Google) por infracción de patentes en el US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. [read post]
14 May 2020, 8:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Dolgencorp LLC and Ja-Ru (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Nagan, in turn, subcontracted with Global International Windows, LLC (Global) to remove and install windows at Hangar B. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
In the meantime, the USPTO just released a decision denying the application for a such a patent holding that under the U.S. patent law, 35 USC §§ 1 et seq. an inventor must be a natural person. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
In the meantime, the USPTO just released a decision denying the application for a such a patent holding that under the U.S. patent law, 35 USC §§ 1 et seq. an inventor must be a natural person. [read post]