Search for: "United States of America v. Oxford" Results 101 - 120 of 218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Events 2 March 2016, 11 KBW Information Law Conference 2016, Royal College of Surgeons, 35-43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE 2 March 2016 Oxford Media Convention, Said Business School, University of Oxford, Park End Street, Oxford OX1 1 HP. 8 March 2016 Seminar on Surveillance and Human Rights, Senate House, Information Law & Policy Centre. 16 March 2016 Seminar: Openness in Britain 2016 – Where are we now? [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
” In his dissent in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Students: Can you recommend three books for those interested in learning more about the history of reproductive politics in the United States? [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
I worried that the more relaxed exercise of issuing draft policy guidance and inviting public comments would become yet another sad episode in the continuing manifestation, particularly in the last ten years, of America’s new form of extra-constitutional government, the Administrative State. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In the antebellum period of the United States, there was fevered debate on this very subject. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Delaware’s position as the presumptive home to corporate America provides the state with significant benefits; the corporate fees Delaware garners represent a substantial portion of the state’s revenue. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Nixon and Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords and ended the Vietnam War for the United States in January 1973. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The United States of America should be permitted to do so, if at all, only in response to the most pressing concerns. [read post]
10 May 2015, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"When and how did the United States ­become a nation? [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Petty, Accommodating 'Religion', (Tennessee Law Review, Forthcoming).Mohammad Fadel, Religious Law, Family Law and Arbitration: Shari'a and Halakha in America, (Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 1, 2015).Marie Ashe, Hosanna-Tabor, the Ministerial Exemption, and Losses of Equality: Constitutional Law and Religious Privilege in the US, (2 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion (2015)).Adam Lamparello, Why Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court Just Made… [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
Whereas his previous work did an admi- rable job of depicting how the historical trans- formation of ownership in the United States was aided by the process of measuring and recording, he has expanded his range here into a somewhat unmanageable though always interesting tract. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Oxford University historian Peter Bartrip, for one, noted that Selikoff had testified frequently. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 On PatLit, Stefano Barazza's thoughtful post on the invalidation of a patent for lip and facial synchronisation of animated characters gives us an insight into life in the United States after Alice v CLS Bank revived the old-fashioned notion that patents are for inventive concepts and not for abstract ideas. [read post]