Search for: "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes"
Results 101 - 120
of 707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2016, 8:06 am
In addition to converting their class certification rulings into class action settlements with higher values and pay-outs, plaintiffs’ lawyers continued to craft refined and more successful class certification theories to counter the more stringent Rule 23 certification requirements established in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
One of them, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:20 am
Finding, however, that under Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v Dukes, 131 S. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
Specifically, she purported to certify the class under Rule 23(b)(2), even though the Supreme Court made clear in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 7:27 pm
On appeal, Tyson Foods argued that plaintiffs’ use of averaging constituted impermissible “trial by formula” under Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:48 am
The Justices’ criticism of “trial by formula” came four years ago in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
” Tyson is relying heavily upon the Court’s 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores v Dukes, which blocked the creation of a nationwide class of present and former workers for the giant retail chain claiming discrimination in wages paid to female workers. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 7:22 pm
Kopp In a case that is certain to provide an important sequel to the Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
See Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
¶26 (quoting Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
¶26 (quoting Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
Incidentally, this was the same court that issued the trial court decision, later decisively overruled in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 8:41 am
Despite the Supreme Court’s rulings against plaintiffs whose claims are too dissimilar, such as Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 7:02 am
” Tyson also notes that using averages to prove liability for the class as a whole conflicted with the Court’s command in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 12:48 pm
In addition, the Seventh Circuit further limited Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 12:10 pm
One wonders how this invitation to certify now and decertify later when more evidence is in satisfies the Supreme Court’s view that Rule 23(b)(3) “requires the judge to make findings about predominance and superiority before allow allowing the class,” Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:51 am
Bouaphakeo, a case that will provide the Supreme Court with the opportunity to clarify the extent to which Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 8:12 am
Riley Whereas Wal-Mart scored a major victory for employers in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
More specifically, the Court is expected to clarify what it means to have a class action “trial by formula,” of which the Court first disapproved in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
More specifically, the Court is expected to clarify what it means to have a class action “trial by formula,” of which the Court first disapproved in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
