Search for: "Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce" Results 101 - 120 of 193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2013, 7:22 pm by Dennis Crouch
Since the exhaustion doctrine only allows a patentee to recoup at one point in the stream-of-commerce, it makes sense that they would focus on the highest valued user. = = = = = Text of the letter: To Members of the United States Congress: We, the undersigned, are 60 professors from 26 states and the District of Columbia who teach and write about intellectual property law and policy. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 10:21 pm by Lauren Bernadett
Representative King calls it the “Protection of Interstate Commerce Act. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm by Bill Marler
This prompts a Citizen’s Petition and federal judge’s ruling that orders the FDA to ban fluid raw milk and milk products from interstate commerce (21 CFR Section 1240.61). [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:37 am by Todd Janzen
A recent Wisconsin farmer’s acquittal for selling “raw” milk may have Indiana farmers wondering to what extent such sales are legal in Indiana.Raw milk is “unpasteurized” milk. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:34 pm by Michael Markarian
Steve King, R-Iowa, that seeks to negate most state and local laws regarding the production or manufacture of agriculture products. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 6:51 am by Bill Marler
The number of infected persons identified in each state was as follows: Alabama (1), Arkansas (1), California (4), Colorado (40), Idaho (2), Illinois (4), Indiana (3), Iowa (1), Kansas (11), Louisiana (2), Maryland (1), Missouri (7), Montana (2), Nebraska (6), Nevada (1), New Mexico (15), New York (2), North Dakota (2), Oklahoma (12), Oregon (1), Pennsylvania (1), South Dakota (1), Texas (18), Utah (1), Virginia (1), West Virginia (1), Wisconsin (2), and Wyoming (4). [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 10:20 pm by Bill Marler
The primary goal of the Act was to protect the health and safety of the public by preventing deleterious, adulterated or misbranded articles from entering interstate commerce. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:37 am by Michelle Yeary
  First, the NLEA contains an express preemption provision:[N]o State or political subdivision of a State may directly or indirectly establish under any authority or continue in effect as to any food in interstate commerce — (3) any requirement for the labeling of food of the type required by section . . . [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 6:39 am by Bill Marler
The shipment in question did not enter into U.S. commerce and no human illnesses were associated with this product.[3] This is another it what will be a long – too long – series of outbreak investigations where we have represented consumers in what I hope will be a cautionary tale, and a learning experience, for manufacturers of food [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
In late December 2012, the President signed the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act, which strengthens the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to ensure it addresses the theft of trade secrets related to a product or service used or intended to be used in interstate or foreign commerce, and to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm by Robert B. Milligan
In late December 2012, the President signed the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act, which strengthens the scope of the Economic Espionage Act to ensure it addresses the theft of trade secrets related to a product or service used or intended to be used in interstate or foreign commerce, and to prevent results like the Second Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 9:52 am by Bill Marler
The shipment in question did not enter into U.S. commerce and no human illnesses were associated with this product. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 3:48 am by Ed Wallis
  It is alleged in lawsuits that have been filed that Bayer placed Mirena into the stream of commerce with wanton and reckless disregard for the public safety. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 10:09 am by E. coli Lawyer
In addition, for products that may have been further distributed and manufactured into other not-ready-to-eat product, FSIS is working to confirm that actions are being taken to remove the product from commerce. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:55 pm by Ed Wallis
  It is alleged in lawsuits that have been filed that Bayer placed Mirena into the stream of commerce with wanton and reckless disregard for the public safety. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:53 pm by Ed Wallis
  It is alleged in lawsuits that have been filed that Bayer placed Mirena into the stream of commerce with wanton and reckless disregard for the public safety. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:53 am by Ed Wallis
  It is alleged in lawsuits that have been filed that Bayer placed Mirena into the stream of commerce with wanton and reckless disregard for the public safety. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
In dealing with the Commerce Clause they are willing to entertain, as they did in NFIB v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, Edison Electric Institute, the American Farm Bureau Federation, environmentalists, labor unions, and others. [read post]