Search for: "XYZ Corporation(s)" Results 101 - 120 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 8:38 am
Especially in the beginning, you may be tempted to save any “motion for XYZ” wholesale in your templates folder. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:01 am
That’s a question posed by futurist and author Richard Susskind, to a group of about 50 in-house counsel during a Canadian Corporate Counsel Association Master Class yesterday in Toronto.Susskind, who wrote The End of Lawyers? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 10:52 am by Steve Bainbridge
Every other XYZ shareholder on the site will see it immediately; you will promptly be able to tell whether they agree with you. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Mandelman
 For example, you didn’t say to the others at the conference table, “Well, we could solve the problem by doing XYZ. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:25 am
Three examples of this are:I give my real estate, located at 1 Main Street, Anytown, State, to my son, Jake Smith.I give my 500 shares of stock of XYZ Corporation to my nephew, Jordan Smith.I give all of my money in Bank Account number #1 at Big Bank, to my daughter, Samantha Smith.A general bequest is a gift of a specific amount, made to a specific person. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 10:00 am by David E. Peterson, Esq.
Let’s look at an example: Assume that XYZ Corporation is a C-Corp owned by me, and that I receive the profits as a dividend. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 4:56 am by Editor
409A Wreaks New Havoc"To illustrate the complexity of the interaction between Section 409A and corporate governance, let's say there's a negative say-on-pay vote against XYZ Corp. that appears to result, in part, from the CEO having accrued a $20 million vested SERP benefit. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:19 am by Moseley Collins
Brown requests that the court deny XYZ 's motion due to XYZ's inexcusable procedural failure and the lack of merit in its legal argument. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:57 am by Moseley Collins
Brown, a retired dentist, has had to start from scratch, using experts who have not had the benefit of unlimited access to XYZ 's wealth of resources. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:40 pm by Robert Weed
 The XYZ Company is out of business, so it can’t pay. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 9:11 pm by Vincent LoTempio
When we are doing more of the corporate work we look at what they have and try to make a determination if there is a match. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:09 am by Erik Gerding
There is something for a law school to gain from having the ABA demand that the law school spend more money on XYZ, mainly greater leverage with main campus administration. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:38 pm by Marvin Ammori
Sounds like: “You support bill XYZ, we give you money. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:25 am by Broc Romanek
Based on my reading of the policy, the FAA would allow CEO to fully reimburse XYZ for the personal use of corporate aircraft, but only if it is possible he could be called back on company business or forced to cancel his trip ( i.e., a normal vacation). [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Traversa v Freddi [2011] EWCA Civ 81 (14 February 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Lightfoot v Go-Ahead Group Plc [2011] EWHC 89 (QB) (01 February 2011) XYZ v Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust [2011] EWHC 243 (QB) (14 February 2011) British Pregnancy Advisory Service v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 235 (Admin) (14 February 2011) Poi v “Lina” [2011] EWHC 234 (QB) (14 February 2011) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 9:38 am by Dan
For example, if your company is called "xyz" and you already own the xyz.com domain name, your email may come from someone who has purchased and now wants to sell you the xyz.cn domain. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:32 am by Moseley Collins
Since the Egan decision, numerous other cases have reenforced that the litmus test for determining a managing agent is the degree to which the corporation has delegated to the employee decision-making discretion in the employee's sphere of authority, not the employee's position in the corporate hierarchy and not the employee's ability to make corporate-wide policy. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 7:19 am by Moseley Collins
As noted, the XYZ Corporate Defendants entirely control the financial operations at Universal Healthcare, going to far as to disallow Universal Healthcare employees from withdrawing money from the facility's own bank account. [read post]