Search for: "Hands On Originals, Inc." Results 1321 - 1340 of 3,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2016, 8:41 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
CHL is a service of Red Arch Cultural Heritage Law & Policy Research, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. (2015), which held that a specialty license plate program constituted “government speech,” so that the government could discriminate based on viewpoint in deciding which plates to allow: The government’s argument in this case that trademark registration amounts to government speech is at odds with the Supreme Court’s analysis in Walker and unmoored from the very concept of government speech. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 4:03 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
The report opens with a letter addressed to the Congressmen which notes that “[S]ince fiscal year 2011, the OFCCP has changed its enforcement practices and updated its regulations to, among other things, reflect recently issued amendments to Executive Order 11246 that established new nondiscrimination requirements, and to increase contractors’ collection of data on workers’ and applicants’ veteran and disability status. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 am by Rick St. Hilaire
CHL is a service of Red Arch Cultural Heritage Law & Policy Research, Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
We need them to make strategic decisions that bring major results.So consider this two-part test next time you're handed an issue: Can this decision be made at a lower level by those who will be directly involved in its implementation? [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
& Institutional Rights,Inc., 547 U.S. 47, 62 (2006). [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:19 pm by Jeffrey Brown and Jodie Herrmann Lawson
  Additionally, CashCall purchased every Western Sky loan almost immediately after origination. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
Before we go any further, I should warn you of two things: One is that this is, necessarily, an unusually long post for this blog; the other is that the case it examines involves issues that may be offensive to or upsetting for some readers.This post examines an opinion from the U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm by Michael Grossman
What’s more, plaintiffs allege that Johnson & Johnson took an active hand for decades in hiding medical study results correlating talcum use with ovarian cancer. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 1:15 am by Jani Ihalainen
Even though he failed in the case at hand, losing his rights in the design, does not take away from his legitimate belief at the time as to the existence of these rights. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
By conceding that the problem was the effect that the light beam had on the appearance of the property — and not either the nature of the beam itself or the message it conveyed — the Respondents have made irrelevant the origin of the light beam, the direction of its projection, and the intent of party projecting it. [read post]