Search for: "Knight v. Knight"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,786
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
I don’t want to give an exaggerated picture of the consequences of Knight-Keynes uncertainty. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:38 pm
which was "reinvented" by a "more conservative" California Supreme Court in the 1992 case of Knight v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:37 am
By Eric Goldman Smith v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
He comes in like a medieval knight, girded for battle. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:17 pm
This week's Rakofsky v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 pm
Rev. 159-171 (2010).Percival, Robert V. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:34 pm
Arnold v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:20 am
We have repeatedly told courts--and the Ninth Circuit in particular, see Brosseau v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 5:20 am
The Federal Circuit’s Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
(IP Dragon) Bridgestone v Bull – prior design defence in China (Class 99) Yao Ming wants to reign supreme over Yao Ming era (IP Dragon) An SME handbook for China. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:04 am
In the recent case of Tony Hook v British Airways plc (2011) EWHC 379 (QB), the High Court was asked to consider whether UK and EU aviation legislation created a private law cause of action sounding in damages in relation to alleged disability discrimination by an airline.The appellant, Mr Hook, who suffered from mobility and learning difficulties, appealed against a decision striking out his claim for damages for injury to his feelings arising from the alleged failure of BA to make… [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
Vacaville, 19 Cal.4th 925, 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 811, 968 P.2d 522, 534 (1988) (observing the ‘commonly known tendency’ of students to engage in immature behavior that could be dangerous to themselves or peers); Moore by and Through Knight v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
Knight, Martin F. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:23 pm
The importance of Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11 (11 May 2011) is that it was the first trial under the new rules for the Patents County Court and thus the first opportunity for the court to consider the cost capping rules in the context of an entire case. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:26 am
On Wednesday HH Judge Birss QC handed down his costs judgment after a prior successful claim by Dame Vivienne against Mr Knight in the Patents County Court (PCC): Westwood v Knight [2011] EWPCC 11 (11 May 2011). [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:18 am
” Uniloc v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm
Knight Co., 156 U.S. 1 (1895) rendered the law ineffective. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Universal Pictures, as precedent.Nichols v. [read post]
