Search for: "*kennedy v. Maryland"
Results 121 - 140
of 461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2011, 3:52 pm
Maryland Court of Appeals. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:15 am
“Maryland Court Suppresses Evidence Gathered By Warrantless Stingray Use” [Tim Cushing, TechDirt] Evenwel v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
Kennedy to apply technical or scientific abilities to the issue of gerrymandering, more specifically partisan gerrymandering. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 5:28 pm
Kennedy did not join her opinion, but litigants assuredly hope that it provides a path toward a majority — here, in Maryland’s Benisek v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Dissent Justice Kennedy dissented with an opinion joined by Justice Lanzinger. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
Altvater v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
J.D.B. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
Mandel (1972) and Justice Kennedy’s concurrence in 2015’s Kerry v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
In Martinez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 3:50 pm
Kennedy as Circuit Justice for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:14 am
In reading Coleman v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:21 am
Kennedy, writing for a five-four majority, insisted that the ruling in the case of Maryland v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am
Justice Kennedy addressed this situation in his concurrence in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 4:03 pm
Frisby v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 12:05 pm
Instead, the court will keep its focus on a quite different case on the issue – the case of Gill v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:17 pm
Something odd happened during Monday’s 59-minute oral argument in Ayestas v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
Two months later, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 12:01 pm
Maryland Court of Appeals. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 7:39 am
In commentary at Slate, Cristian Farias suggests that the Court’s recent decision in Heien v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
On Wednesday, November 29, the Court heard argument in Watters v. [read post]
