Search for: "146 L L C" Results 121 - 140 of 269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
Then Defendants argue that their name, “Moschino,” falls into the exception of Section 1202(c), as “personally identifying information about the user of a work”. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Pharmaciens (Ordre professionnel des) c Kanou, 2015 CanLII 84927 (QC CDOPQ) [25] Lorsque des sanctions sont suggérées conjointement par les parties, le Conseil n’a pas à s’interroger sur la sévérité ou la clémence des suggestions communes sur sanction et doit y donner suite, sauf s’il les considère déraisonnables,… [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Although this task is governed by ss. 718 et seq. of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Administrator
Axa Assurances inc., 2015 QCCA 1684; Mercier c. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Nadeau-Dubois c. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Lasker,“Defending Daubert: It’s Time to Amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702,” 57 William & Mary L. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by J
A very common example of the first of these (i.e. personal indemnity) is the s.146 costs clause, i.e. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) The most-consulted French-language decision was Rothmans, Benson & Hedges inc. c. [read post]
12 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Dans l'affaire C-146/13, l'Espagne contestait la légalité de la procédure devant l'OEB au regard du droit de l'UE. [read post]
5 May 2015, 5:58 am
The full text of the Decisions [updated 11:20am] is available online at C-146/13 and C-147/13. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Le juge de première instance a retenu que les arrérages ne pouvaient en effet rétroagir qu’au mois d’octobre 2010 et que l’ensemble des dépenses soumises par le père compensait largement l’écart de pension alimentaire qu’il aurait dû verser si la pension avait été rajustée suivant le barème, en tenant compte de l’augmentation des revenus. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:11 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
En In Re Velázquez Quiles 146 DPR 30, el abogado recibió de manos de su cliente, la Sra. [read post]