Search for: "Abercrombie & Fitch Co." Results 121 - 132 of 132
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’ – motion for leave to… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:33 am
Jan. 29: ESPN, part of the Walt Disney Co., (nyse: DIS - news - people ) will cut 200 jobs and Disney-ABC Television Group will release 400 to cope with weak economy. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The story of Asplundh, similar to the stories of IFCO, Abercrombie and Fitch, Chipotle and many others, should serve as both an informative and cautionary tale. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am by Robin Shea
He was talking about Samantha Elauf, in the EEOC’s case against AbercrombieFitch, which I have covered exte [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  The story of Asplundh, similar to the stories of IFCO, Abercrombie and Fitch, Chipotle and many others, should serve as both an informative and cautionary tale. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am by Guest Author
Personal Liability for Unlawful Harassment The regulations also now incorporate a long-standing provision of FEHA dating back to 2001, which provided that any employee who engages in unlawful harassment of a co-employee is personally liable for harassment, regardless of whether the employer knew or should have known of the conduct and/or failed to take corrective action. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. 14-86Issue: Whether an employer can be liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for refusing to hire an applicant or discharging an employee based on a “religious observance and practice” only if the employer has actual knowledge that a religious accommodation was required and the employer's actual knowledge resulted from direct, explicit notice from the applicant or employee. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
  Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 7:53 am
  In the Southern District of New York, Tiffany & Co. sued eBay for the promotion and sale of ‘bogus goods. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 5:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Abercrombie  & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994, 1004 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]