Search for: "Arthur Andersen LLP"
Results 121 - 140
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2009, 9:45 am
Arthur Andersen, the California Supreme Court has broadly interpreted the California Business and Professions Code to further prohibit employee noncompetition agreements which seek to prevent a former employee from working for a competitor, subject to specific statutory exceptions. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:42 pm
Supreme Court decided Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:16 pm
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:39 am
CIVIL PROCEDURE, CONTRACTS, CORPORATION & ENTERPRISE LAW, DISPUTE RESOLUTION & ARBITRATION, TAX LAW Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 4:02 pm
Supreme Court decided Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:43 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:42 am
Our readers will also be interested in today's Arthur Andersen, LLP v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:08 am
In Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:09 am
The Court has released the opinion in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 pm
The NVCA also intends to encourage the use of a broader array ofservice providers such as the "Global Six" including Deloitte LLP, Ernst & Young LLP,Grant Thornton LLP, KPMG LLP, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and BDO Seidman LLP. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 11:21 am
Arthur Andersen LLP, 44 Cal.4th 937 (2008), reaffirmed that employee non-competition agreements are void in California unless they fall within narrow exceptions to Business and Professions Code Section 16600. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:59 am
The transcript for the argument in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
., the Court will hear argument in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
(post-conviction, due process, Sec. 1983, DNA testing, freestanding claim of innocence, discovery, substantive claim, materiality, habeas petition, exculpatory evidence) Tuesday, March 3 Arthur Andersen LLP, et. al. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 10:00 pm
., et al. (08-22) - duty of elected judge to disqualify from case in which a major campaign donor has an interest Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
United States (08-108) and Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 7:59 am
ARTHUR ANDERSEN: NON-COMPETE AGREEMENTS AND GENERAL RELEASESBy Jennifer Brown Shaw and Becki D. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
Merits briefs for the petitioner are due Monday in Arthur Andersen LLP, et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 6:21 am
Arthur Andersen.]Separately, of copyright ownership, note that, in copyright (unlike in patent), there is a work-for-hire doctrine, such that if the employer hires the employee to do work (for example, create a sculpture), the employer can end up owning the copyright. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 4:34 pm
Massey Coal (08-22) — duty of elected judge to disqualify from case in which a major campaign donor has an interest Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
