Search for: "Ashley Deeks"
Results 121 - 140
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2015, 5:16 pm
For those states, the international legal basis for using force in Syria against ISIS is based on the “unwilling or unable” theory (expertly analyzed by Ashley Deeks here). [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 7:04 am
Ashley Deeks and Michael Livermore highlighted the risks that more embarrassing materials like the Apprentice tape might be used to blackmail a future President Trump. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:45 pm
I say that because, just eight months ago, a similar set of airstrikes conducted by the United States were defended on the ground that AMISOM forces, alone, were endangered (see Ashley Deeks, here, and me here). [read post]
9 May 2020, 8:31 am
Scott Anderson and Ashley Deeks asked whether a recent private military incursion by former green berets violated the 1794 Neutrality Act by invading Venezuela. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm
This year’s delegates are Bobby Chesney (UT-Austin), Ashley Deeks (U. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:13 am
Ashley Deeks warned that the United States needs to start thinking about how to address pervasive domestic surveillance in other states, including China. [read post]
14 May 2016, 7:26 am
Ashley Deeks started the forum and discussed the constraints and structural limits that peer intelligence services of foreign states can put on the intelligence work of their counterparts. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 3:27 pm
Location: Sheffield-Massey Room (Townes Hall 2.111), UT School of Law 9:00am - 9:30am Welcome and breakfast: Introduction by Judge James Baker 9:30am - 10:30am SESSION 1: Cyber in the Intelligence/Surveillance Context Bill Banks (Syracuse) Jen Daskal (American) 10:45am - 11:45am SESSION 2: Cyber in the Criminal Law Context Paul Ohm (Georgetown) Jennifer Granick (Stanford) Richard Downing (Justice Department) Sean Farrell (FBI) 11:45am -… [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 8:16 am
Manal Cheema and Ashley Deeks explained the legal basis for prosecuting purposeful coronavirus exposure as terrorism. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:28 pm
Ashley Deeks discussed how “law tech,” or AI tools designed to support legal work, might play out in the international law setting. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 7:00 pm
The detention question was raised a while back on Lawfare, in a 2013 post by Ashley Deeks regarding UN “standard operating procedures to govern detentions that arise in the course of UN operations. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 12:46 pm
As Ashley Deeks noted, states increasingly resort to multi-part tests (MPTs) when justifying uses of force that don’t fall within the strict confines of the UN Charter. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
” Blank offers precisely one citation for the “unwilling or unable” test, and that citation will not surprise you: Ashley Deeks’ forthcoming article in the Virginia Journal of International Law. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 7:00 am
Ashley Deeks considered Maliki’s constitutional argument. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 11:42 pm
(Ashley Deeks at least cites a couple of law reviews in defense of it, albeit one from 1958, in addition to — unsurprisingly — statements by American officials.) [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:11 am
” The Obama administration (as Benjamin Wittes and I explain in this book chapter) holds to the US government’s traditional view that a lawful target does not cease being a lawful target under the laws of war in virtue of crossing a border – the restrictions in any particular circumstance, if any, arise under jus ad bellum considerations of the rights of neutral states, subject to the “unable or unwilling” test, articulated by Ashley Deeks in her… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 6:33 pm
Ashley Roach, JAGC U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
Ashley Deeks has explored the dynamics of how this interstate intelligence cooperation constrains the U.S. intelligence community, referring to these limitations as “peer constraints. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 8:10 am
However, as Ashley Deeks points out, the manual for U.S. attorneys includes certain provisions designed to protect the press from the full enforcement of Section 641. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 9:53 am
Marty Lederman provided a broad summary over at Just Security and here at Lawfare Jack Goldsmith, Ashley Deeks, and Daniel Bethlehem have been discussing Egan’s treatment of imminence under the jus ad bellum. [read post]
