Search for: "Auto-Owners Insurance Co"
Results 121 - 140
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2018, 8:35 am
Auto-Owners Insurance Co., No. 17-12945-E, 2018 WL 1611256 (11th Cir. 2018), that an insurer did not have a duty to defend and indemnify its insured in a false marketing suit. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:00 am
Smith had no auto insurance, but was covered by the car owner’s insurance, Liberty Mutual. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
Co., 649 A.2d 680 (Pa. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 11:48 am
That’s still in excess of Florida’s minimum auto insurance rates. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 1:53 pm
For most victims, that means their own insurer will cover the first $2,000 in medical bills, after which time their own medical insurance kicks in (with their auto insurer stepping in to reimburse policyholders for doctor co-pays, deductibles and lost wages) up to $8,000. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 1:53 pm
For most victims, that means their own insurer will cover the first $2,000 in medical bills, after which time their own medical insurance kicks in (with their auto insurer stepping in to reimburse policyholders for doctor co-pays, deductibles and lost wages) up to $8,000. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm
Co. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:50 pm
In Michigan Dep't of Agriculture v Appletree Marketing, Inc, the Michigan Supreme Court held that the Agricultural Commodities Marketing Act (ACMA) does not provide the exclusive remedy for its violation and does not supersede preexisting statutory remedies or abrogate common law remedies.The Court concluded that the Court of Appeals erred by relying on Morales v Auto-Owner's Insurance Co. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Do not brag that you got one over on the auto repair shop. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 6:13 pm
Auto Owners Ins. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 1:27 pm
The case is Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:53 am
While the female co-owner of the dog had an auto insurance policy that covered her and her vehicle, the male co-owner was operating one of his employer’s cars to meet the plaintiff, who had purchased an old pickup truck from the dog owner’s son. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:30 am
While a delivery person has the right to pursue a workers’ comp claim against the employer, the property owner likely has liability insurance. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 12:33 pm
In agreeing with plaintiff, the Court of Appeals made an important distinction between sanctions sought pursuant to the no-fault act (such as an award of attorney fees under MCL 500.3148) and Section 2591 of the Revised Judicature Act of 1961 (regarding frivolous actions or defenses), which would not be permitted once the parties resolved the case via case evaluation, see Larson v Auto-Owners Insurance Company, 194 Mich App 329; 486 NW2d 128 (1992), and sanctions imposed… [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 8:06 am
Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
Co., 2017 WL 714036 (E.D. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:00 am
Owners Insurance Co., 829 F.3d 1209 (U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 10:11 am
According to the court records, a vehicle owner added liability and uninsured/ underinsured auto insurance coverage for a pickup truck. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 2:00 am
Chicago and North Western Transportation Co. (1986), 151 Ill. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:44 am
The Communication suggests that the two approaches can co-exist, but it is a bit like trying to mix oil and water. [read post]
