Search for: "BOOKER STEVENS"
Results 121 - 140
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2007, 11:21 am
Justice Stevens makes this point explicitly when he says that the Court's opinion "makes clear ... that the rebuttability of the presumption is real. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:23 am
Justice Stevens makes this point explicitly when he says that the Court's opinion "makes clear ... that the rebuttability of the presumption is real. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Does an appellate presumption of reasonableness violate Sixth Amendment rights, as stated in Apprendi and Booker? [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
The Sixth Amendment's impact: Given the Court's recent ruling in Cunningham and the affinity shown by Justices Stevens, Scalia and Thomas for the Sixth Amendment jury trial right, there likely will be at least one Rita opinion stressing the impact and import of the Sixth Amendment in post-Booker sentencing. 2. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:43 pm
Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law and Policy on the Sixth Circuit's decision in Birka, which highlights issues still in question after Booker and Blakely. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:03 pm
(After all, these two Justices combined for four opinions in Booker). [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
Addition: Jan Crawford Greenburg also posted this entry on her Legalities blog saying that the Court should not be described as the "Kennedy Court" but rather that "it's the Roberts Court vs. the Stevens Court. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Booker, 543 U. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
Booker, 543 U. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 4:34 am
(reversing supervised release violation conviction arising from use of nolo pleas).Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
In Cunningham, three justices - Breyer, Kennedy and Alito - concluded that her opinion was inconsistent with the opinion she joined in Booker, the decision from two years ago that the Federal Guidelines were, on balance, more constitutional than not.But in Booker itself, four different justices - Scalia, Thomas, Stevens and Souter - concluded in their messily bickering way that the "remedial opinion" Justice Ginsburg… [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
Stevens, 2007 U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:40 am
Booker, supra, 543 U.S. at 284-85 (Stevens, J., dissenting in part). [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:10 am
Supreme Court has ruled cannot alone be the basis for a valid police stop.
Aviation LawTuesday, February 27, 2007By Steven R. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 3:49 am
Though the details presented by this New York Daily News article are sketchy, it appears that a federal judge in New York has relied in part on a defendant's weight loss to impose a lower term in a Booker resentencing. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:33 pm
Justice Stevens wonderfully started to gravitate toward an offense/offender distinction in his questioning of counsel for the Government. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 12:13 pm
of consensus What SCOTUS should be doing Solving the SCOTUS docket mystery Additional SCOTUS docket dissection Time to take some more Blakely and Booker cases.... [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:34 pm
(Presumably Judge Fernandez intended the former definition . . . .)Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Joining her were Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Stevens, Scalia, Thomas and Souter. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
Booker, 543 U. [read post]
